U.S. Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh has suggested Donald Trump could attempt to deploy troops to U.S. cities under the Insurrection Act.

The Insurrection Act of 1807 allows the president to call on reserve or active-duty military to suppress rebellion or domestic violence or enforce the law in states.

Kavanaugh’s remarks came in a separate opinion after the court on Tuesday refused to allow the Trump administration to deploy National Guard troops in the Chicago area to support its immigration crackdown.

The high court declined the administration’s emergency request to overturn a ruling by U.S. District Judge April Perry that had blocked the deployment of troops. Three justices—Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch—publicly dissented.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    14 days ago

    The cool part is how his admin’s crackdown on “illegals” has completely eradicated crime. So of course deploying troops will only make america even greater! /s

  • frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    14 days ago

    He doesn’t care because he’s not vulnerable to it like the rest of us without special security and giant houses to bunker in away from the chaos. I suggest he be placed directly in the path of the military once the insurrection act is used so he can fully appreciate his wisdom.

  • GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    He tries to pull that and I have a feeling he’ll get a real insurrection or 50 to deal with. Surely that would be the line too far, right guys???

    • ceenote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Thing is, none of the troops want to go out and be jack booted storm troopers for fat old dementia Donald.

        • ceenote@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          14 days ago

          Some, but nowhere near as many as voted for him. There’s a gigantic canyon between “willing to vote and argue for him” and “willing to fight and die for him.” Especially after how much of a letdown his 2nd term has been for a lot of people.

          • krashmo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            14 days ago

            I bet this is exactly the kind of thing German citizens were saying to each other in the 30s.

          • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 days ago

            “willing to fight and die for him.”

            Is that what they call smashing people’s doors down and kicking the shit out of unarmed civilians?

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 days ago

            I mean, they voted to cut health care from people, increase their own health care premiums, raise taxes on all foreign goods, destroy the exports of goods like soybeans, cut funding from schools/teachers, and make sure taxes stay low for the billionaires.

            What did they want in return? Nothing. They didn’t ask for better health care even though they are going to pay more, they didn’t demand lower prices on goods that would be local, and no promises were made to subsidize local businesses to ensure they could start manufacturing such products to equalize the prices anytime in the next umpteen years.

            I don’t get it, they voted to pay more, to give it to billionaires faster, with 0 plan on how the middle class will ever grow back.

            Small businesses will all die out, and they’ll give it all to oligarchs… for nothing in return

        • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 days ago

          Assume 50%, the military subset of the electorate probably matches the distribution of the public electorate.

          probably

          • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 days ago

            The military is actually considerable more diverse and lower compensated than the general US population. But also considerably more male, so it’s really anyone’s guess, but they all have families and friends who are Americans, so it’s unlikely they are going to be categorically willing to fight a war against their own country.

            • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 days ago

              unlikely they are going to be categorically willing to fight a war against their own country.

              I really really hope so.

  • Aljernon@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    13 days ago

    Here’s a picture of Karl Rove with a young Brett Kavanaugh if you don’t think this has been plan for a long time. Brett’s been groomed to serve the Ruling Class since he was very young.

    • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Bullshit. You’ll all roll over and take it and wait for the next “red line” that you’ll ignore too.