3·
7 hours ago“Be alive in 2028?”
- 364 Posts
- 10.1K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: July 30th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
2·8 hours agoSo, wait, is “The Way to Eden” ＼(°o°)／ or (•‿•) ?
801·8 hours ago"Is there some way I can force Elon Musk to pay $47 to Cards Against Humanity PAC?
Funny you should ask! If you’re a registered voter in PA, GA, NV, AZ, NC, WI, or MI, just type your name into this dumb website for his PAC, put “MuskIsDumb@cah.lol” as your referrer, and they’ll be legally obligated to pay us $47. The more people who do this, the more Musk money we’ll get to un-fuck America.
If he doesn’t pay up, we’ll sue him again."
1·9 hours agoRemoved for civility and tenp banned for blaming a rape victim.
Removed, civility.
If they won’t expand the court, they could do what the House and Senate did to Johnson and that’s shrink the court.
Unfortunately, the only fair way to do it would also remove Brown-Jackson.
“Five, five is a good number. Remove the four most recently added.”
You’d get rid of the Trump court, but also Jackson, and it would still be 3-2 right wing court. Thomas, Alito, Roberts, Kagan, Sotomayor.
Not sure, I left it.
538 is an aggregate.
If you look at the polling page for Michigan:
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/michigan/
Harris wins 4 out of the 7 most recent polls. Trump wins 2. One was a tie.
Right now, things are looking good in MI and the 3rd party vote is right at 0 to 1% as predicted.
“Unreasonable” isn’t pejorative.
“Fucking unreasonable” would be removed.
Technically this breaks the rules as it’s not an article.
I’m choosing to not remove it because:
- Mod Abuse
- CAH is awesome
- It’s for a good cause
- It’s hilarous
- Hitler
- We need something here not submitted by UniversalMonk ;)
Point of comparison: For the communities I moderate I try to keep it around 3 per DAY that I submit for fear I’ll dominate the conversation.
Of the 5 currently undecided states, Trump needs 3-4 to win. PA + 2 to 3 more.
Harris needs 1. PA. That’s it. Even if she loses PA, there’s a path to win with 2 states or 3 states.
I made a whole comment on it here:
At least this one doesn’t quote Frank Luntz.
I think the trick is that sometimes it’s a legit link and sometimes it’s a aggregate. AMP links from Google are also always a problem, but it’s not like Google has a news service like MSN does.
I’ll definitely raise it with the mods and admins and see what they think!
Worse than Andrew (1992)?
No shit, Joe!
Harris has 3 paths to victory, a 1, 2, or 3 state solution.
Trump has 2 paths, a 3 or 4 state solution.
Only 5 states are up for grabs. If Harris loses PA, she has 2 more options.
If Trump wins PA, he still needs 2 to 3 other states.
I’m not sure what you mean by “dark patterns” in this context. Isn’t this just marketing?
Is it that the more expensive choice is pre-selected? That the discounted price is likely just the real price and it’s never sold at the higher price? (that one got Saatva in trouble! - https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/open-lawsuit-settlements/11-5m-saatva-com-false-advertising-class-action-settlement/)