I don’t deny that China has made, and continues to makd, many impressive advances that have really helped its people. I acknowledge that it achieves many things capitalist countries don’t even try to achieve. But its government is also harsh towards its critics, and that can be expected to have an effect on surveys.

“No real human would go four links deep into a maze of AI-generated nonsense,” Cloudflare explains. “Any visitor that does is very likely to be a bot, so this gives us a brand-new tool to identify and fingerprint bad bots.”

It sounds like there may be a plan to block known bots once they have used this tool to identify them. Over time this would reduce the amount of AI slop they need to generate for the AI trap, since bots already fingerprinted would not be served it. Since AI generators are expensive to run, it would be in Cloudflare’s interests to do this. So while your concern is well placed, in this particular case there may be a surge of energy and water usage at first that tails off once more bots are fingerprinted.

Some of these LLMs introduce very subtle statistical patterns into their output so it can be recognized as such. So it is possible in principle (not sure how computationally feasible when crawling) to avoid ingesting whatever has these patterns. But there will also be plenty of AI content that is not deliberately marked in this way, which would be harder to filter out.

I don’t think PP is very moderate. But who knows. All he does is pal around with fascist lowlifes, make lame attack ads and parrot MAGA bigotry. He doesn’t actually propose anything positive.

Are you talking about Teams in Teams for Home or Teams for Work and School, and is it Teams or New Teams you mean?

Obsidian is a fancy markdown editor with metadata, sync, indexing, data querying and views and a lively ecosystem of plugins. It has everything except being open source.

Same for ZDNet.

In the current climate I think they’re not unreasonable suspicions.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

You could use any trustworthy sync service with automatic camera uploads, but they will all wait until the video has finished recording before uploading it. Ideally there would be an app that streams live to a remote server that’s recording. There used to be. A sync service might be second best though.

Do any dash cams stream to the cloud or a self-hosted server? If the police spot the dashcam they may just delete the footage.

You need something that streams to a secure server, so the police can’t just delete the video.

Of course. In the current climate this bill would be a huge problem.

People outside the USA will still run instances. It might become harder for people in the USA to access them, depending on how these measures are enforced.

The Nazi bars will survive. It’s the dissenters and minorities trying to speak in them that will be silenced as a self-protective move by tech corporations.

The platforms are pushing false and controversial content to drive engagement and have not implemented the necessary guardrails to verify correctness and minimize harm (like, when a post/blog is inciting violence).

In the current climate I very much doubt that this is how the bill would be used if it became law. It will be used to silence political dissenters and prevent the organization of resistance. Right-wing disinformation will get a pass. Left-wing content will be censored. LGBTQ+ content will be censored. Health advice for trans people will be censored. Black history content will be censored. Women’s health and feminist content will be censored. Tech companies are not about to risk the wrath of Trump and huge financial penalties to stand up for these people’s right to speak.

Yes, so often we see people online saying “Ha ha, let the morons get COVID/measles/bird flu/etc!” They don’t stop to think about the risk to everyone else, particularly vulnerable people some of whom can’t get vaccinated and rely on herd immunity. In all these years still that lesson doesn’t seem to have been learned. I suspect the people saying this are healthy young people who haven’t really considered how different from theirs some people’s lives are.

Yep:

“Reduced transparency in official statistics is perhaps the most troubling aspect of disbanding FESAC,” wrote Claudia Sahm, a former Federal Reserve economist, at Bloomberg on March 11. “Cutting off agency staff from external advisers creates an environment where political interference could occur much more easily—and go undetected. With political officials such as Lutnick arguing publicly that GDP should exclude government spending, it is especially important to have external, independent experts.”

Not even violence. Against any dissenting thought.