Embrace this Truth and enjoy life - eviltoast
  • Asswardbackaddict@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve embraced existentialism. Finally found a definition of spituality I could digest and apply: “How you emotionally relate to the world.” Since then, I let my primitive, primate brain do things like feel jealousy and be wrong about things. Pretty freeing

  • Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Life has as much meaning as we give it, humans think life has inherent meaning, ergo life has meaning.

    Let’s start thinking that cooperation has meaning, that the divine plan is for us to realize that everything around is what life should not be and that all of it is a choice we make every day

  • xkbx@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    but like what if we really hated other people based on superficial traits and stuff? That could be kinda cool

    • Pudutr0n@feddit.cl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 days ago

      Sounds like a fun game. Maybe we could also include some kind of points system where everyone played excessively complex and very RNG heavy minigames and either won or lost points based on how well they did.

      Then we could also implement people looking down upon those with less points or getting really worked up about people with a lot of them.

  • Sergio@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    “Evolution is blind” is debatable. Arguably, we evolved to fit an environment. We are survivors.

    • dbtng
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’ll go farther and say that its wrong. Evolution may be a random walk, but random walk is a method of getting places. Evolution random walks to the next needed feature. Evolution is not at all blind.

      • Sergio@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’ll go farther and say that its wrong.

        Well, it’s debatable but I think it comes down to defining your terms.

        • “Evolution is blind” suggests no guidance at all, and as you say there is randomness, but an important part of the evolutionary process is survival and propagation which are guided by the environment. so arguably evolution is NOT blind.
        • However the evolutionary process is reactive and does not involve long-term planning so you could argue that “blind” means “looking ahead, considering more than what you can immediately sense.” so arguably evolution IS blind.

        Either perspective agrees that there is no “Grand Architect” and/or “God’s Plan” which I think is the general point being made. But it’s just a little distracting.

        • shneancy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          evolution is blind because all of it is an accident. life forms that survive long enough to make more life forms get their genes to live on. any life form that doesn’t, well, doesn’t. better survivability because of an error in copying genes? more offspring. worse survivability? less offspring

          there is no intention to evolution, it’s simply a consequence of the fact that some primitive life forms at some point felt a desire to copy their genes and the process of doing so is imperfect. That desire, probably a product of random copying itself, is what made all living things today

      • UnhingedFridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s blind because in nature, it often fucks up, and the extreme fuck ups die off without continuing the process.

        • johsny@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Which is, I think, exactly what happened to the homo sapiens branch. Dinosaurs lasted hundreds of millions of years, we are barely at 300k and we are killing ourselves. Dead end. (For us)

    • Signtist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s true that we evolved in response to an environment, but the actual genetic changes that allowed for that were not developed with purpose. They happened randomly, and the ones that happened to provide a benefit made those individuals more likely to have more kids that those with less beneficial random changes.

  • aviationeast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    ‘“Existance is pain!” -Mr. Meseeks’ - Michael Scott…

    Let’s go boys, time to speed run mankind’s extinction with global warming!

  • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    We know, but we can choose to carry on anyway in spite of it, revile in the absurdity, dance in the moonlight and be very very French.

  • Cadenza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Well yes, sadly, we can’t embrace a cosmic perspective, because it’s not ours. We can have a human perspective though.