Embrace this Truth and enjoy life - eviltoast
  • Sergio@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’ll go farther and say that its wrong.

    Well, it’s debatable but I think it comes down to defining your terms.

    • “Evolution is blind” suggests no guidance at all, and as you say there is randomness, but an important part of the evolutionary process is survival and propagation which are guided by the environment. so arguably evolution is NOT blind.
    • However the evolutionary process is reactive and does not involve long-term planning so you could argue that “blind” means “looking ahead, considering more than what you can immediately sense.” so arguably evolution IS blind.

    Either perspective agrees that there is no “Grand Architect” and/or “God’s Plan” which I think is the general point being made. But it’s just a little distracting.

    • shneancy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      evolution is blind because all of it is an accident. life forms that survive long enough to make more life forms get their genes to live on. any life form that doesn’t, well, doesn’t. better survivability because of an error in copying genes? more offspring. worse survivability? less offspring

      there is no intention to evolution, it’s simply a consequence of the fact that some primitive life forms at some point felt a desire to copy their genes and the process of doing so is imperfect. That desire, probably a product of random copying itself, is what made all living things today