Racismed - eviltoast
  • FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    169
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yeah so somebody grew up in a racist household that prioritized Protestant ideals about work and success. And then that person moved to Silicon Valley with Daddy’s money and worked there during its bommiest years. Then went on to pump money into electric cars and rockets.

    This all came to a screeching halt during Covid when all of a sudden, he had to not prioritize profits and success but rather the health and safety of his employees and others.

    This sent him down a rabbit hole on Twitter where suddenly he felt accepted by all the Trump crowd. Now he’s stuck there and slides further right each day.

    This guy is now the wealthiest person on the planet.

    Fuck Elon.

  • Margot Robbie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    137
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I genuinely can’t tell if the comic was added by somebody else to mock Musk’s tweet, or if Musk is such a narcissistic prick with zero self awareness that he "“ironically” added this comic as part of his fellow-kids memelord act.

    Truth is stranger than fiction.

  • Isakk86@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    110
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Just when I think I couldn’t hate him anymore, he omits the Oxford comma…

    • pachrist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      For real. Diversity could easily be considered antithetical to racism. Inclusion could be considered antithetical to sexism. But no, Chef Elon made pseudo-intellectual word salad.

      But, “Worlds grossly richest man not big on equity” feels like an Onion article title.

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Also, “woke” more or less means “enlightened,” so “anti-woke” is pretty much “ignorance is strength.”

        • pachrist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I feel like wokeness in general requires empathy and understanding of the plight of others. Anti-woke means being unempathetic, and folks feel that is positive? I literally can’t comprehend being for Team Sociopath, but millions of people will vote for Trump, so it’s real.

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Could be, but like countries that use the words “Democratic” and/or “People’s” in their names, just because you call something by a word doesn’t necessarily mean that word is accurate.

        Often “diversity, inclusion and equity” in practice means doing things that would rightly be called out as sexist and racist but targeting the “right” sex and/or race.

        • Jtotheb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Without citing specific examples, it sounds like you just don’t like affirmative action programs, which is an opinion I’d be embarrassed to say out loud. When one group of people has all the money and all the connections, it’s not fair to say “just treat everyone equally!” because it maintains the unequal status quo—poorer minority groups continue getting into schools at lower rates since they live in poorer neighborhoods with poorer schools and poorer access to the funds needed for higher education, women continue getting passed up for management positions, leading to more male dominated companies hiring more men for more management positions, et cetera

          • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            When one group of people has all the money and all the connections, it’s not fair to say “just treat everyone equally!” because it maintains the unequal status quo

            Then targeting socioeconomic status makes more sense. Any system that categorizes people and puts poor white folks in the same “has all the money and connections” bucket as the Clintons and the Obamas in the same “has no money or connections” bucket as poor black folks is not, in any way, actually about having money or connections.

            • Jtotheb@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Well unfortunately, the overlap is close enough to a circle that it makes plenty of sense, especially since the issue is not purely economic, but social, as you accidentally point out by using the phrase socioeconomic. Obama has wealth that is unfathomable to the everyday person, as does Clinton—both deal with a society that belittles them because of who they are in a way that white men don’t face, rich or poor.

              Surely you’ve noticed that Obama is the only black president so far, despite black people making up 10 to 20% of the population over the last few centuries.

              You are also aware that Clinton would have been the first female U.S. President. She won the popular vote by a significant margin, which is a great sign for public opinion on women, but the reality is still that women, who are more than half the country, are not more than half in charge of it.

              The fact these two got as far as they did is in no small part thanks to the concept of affirmative action, where we try to right past wrongs and level the playing field. Encourage women to go into nontraditional fields, encourage black students to apply for Ivy League schools and ensure there are spots for them—these things only “hurt” white men because resources are so artificially limited already, disproportionately held by the tiny percentage of [rich white men] who control the US’s giant conglomerates and obedient politicians, and regular old white men aren’t used to feeling the squeeze.

              Did Obama pull the ladder up behind him somewhat by applying the same neoliberal bullshit that has destroyed the concept of compassionate social safety nets in favor of a more competitive marketplace? Can you be mad at him? Yeah. That’s beside the point. White people have been allowed to fuck over other white people for ages.

    • CareHare@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I thought this at first as well. But then I thought he probably is that dislodged from reality that he genuinely thinks he’s discriminated against when people mention equity and stuff like that because he’s the antagonist of equity.

      If everyone in the world is at least not poor and comfortable it means a lot less wealth for him; a big No No for PeElon.

        • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          The origin of that phrase is ironic, given how it’s used. It originates from a USENET post from the late 90s by what was essentially a proto-MRA referring to a woman.

          I could see applying it in that direction today still, if talking about certain domains, like conscription or basically anything tied to the criminal justice system, or services for the homeless or victims of abuse.

    • MinekPo1 [She/Her]@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      honestly what I hate the most about those quotes is that every one of those slogans actually have a quite clear meaning , especially within the context of the book .

      • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I find myself saying “We are the dead” quite a lot when something reality bending occurs (you know, like Elon opening his pie hole), because that’s how it feels.

  • Red_October@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    8 months ago

    When you remember he got his starting wealth from an apartheid emerald mine in South Africa, this behavior makes perfect sense.

    • 7heo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      They would not even understand, they practice narciss-ism even more often than rac-ism.

      Also, talking about inclusivity, this is a (probably not fully exhaustive) list of all the "-ism"s. That is how much of an ignorant cretin people using this neologism are.

  • The Cooking Senpai@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    The lion, the witch and the audacity of this bitch

    (in 4 bitch as a gender neutral way of saying whining child while doing a rhyme)

  • li10@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m generally sick of hearing about Elon at all even if it’s criticizing him, but this was a good one.

    The vanity is off the charts.

  • IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 months ago

    Bet a board member tried to explain to him what DEI is two minutes before he Xat this Xeet.

    Muskrat’s diversity plan is “exploit Indians who rely on Xitter visa sponsorship”