‘Stop all time wasting’: Woolworths workers tracked and timed under new efficiency crackdown - eviltoast
  • Salvo@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    23 days ago

    “We are price gouging customers, we are ripping off suppliers and we are making our customers feel like criminals. What else can we do it pure evil?”

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    22 days ago

    I’d love to see that kind of bullshit being applied on the c-level, but no, it’s always the actual workers who aren’t being efficient

  • SpicyLizards@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    23 days ago

    Must be hard making record profits while hiking prices and having to deal with actual employees. Poor foolworths…

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    23 days ago

    As a long time worker of many different jobs, slacking off is the most important part of the job. Even if you like the job. All this will do is burn out all their employees faster than normal and make productivity suffer for the whole company. I’ve worked for a lot of small companies and penny pinching is the easiest way to lose a lot of money in the long run.

  • Hirom@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    Going to such extreme is probably costing the company on a medium/long term.

    It may improve productivity for the first few weeks, but this is bad for employees physical and mental well-being. This is obviously increasing injuries and burnout. Meaning more sick leave, worse employee turnover.

  • sola@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 days ago

    Hence in the upcoming election preference LNP/ALP last. The C-class of these companies will coordinate with these political parties to reduce the influence of employees in the workplace, so they can exploit the excess productivity for there own personal gain.

    • vividspecter@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      23 days ago

      Just make sure you put Labor ahead of the LNP and cooker parties since they will be objectively worse. But otherwise, agreed.

      • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        23 days ago

        Though put the Greens ahead of Labor. Labor losing seats to the Greens, and having to depend on the Greens to govern, is a realistic possibility, and Greens MPs holding their feet to the fire could provide a counterbalance to the revolving door to corporate Australia.

        • melbaboutown@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          22 days ago

          Cooker parties means there can be independent parties with uh… fringe beliefs that you may not align with. So it’s good to do research on each party or candidate

        • eureka@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          22 days ago

          afaik, ‘cooker’ has risen as a slang term for the wackier conspiracy theorists:

          From Wiktionary:

          1. (slang, Australia) A person who makes or uses illicit drugs, especially methamphetamine or cannabis.
          1. (slang, derogatory, Australia) A person who is cooked in the head; a crazy person.
          2. (slang, derogatory, Australia) A conspiracy theorist, especially one who is involved in politics.
          • guillem@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            22 days ago

            Oh okay, I think I have in mind some politicians that fit into the description. Thanks!

        • vividspecter@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          22 days ago

          eureka explained it well, but my slighter broader definition is:

          • Anti-vaxxer and other single-issue conspiracy parties
          • Religious right parties with sometimes innocuous names (like “Family first”)
          • Nazis
    • Salvo@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      We have preferential voting for a reason (except for literal Nazis), the major parties should always be last on everyone’s ballot.

      It should be;

      1. Someone I agree with
      2. Someone I agree with on a lot of issues but not quite everything.
      3. ditto
      4. ditto
      5. Greens, unless the candidate is a complete hippy fucktard that doesn’t know how economics works.
      6. Shit Lite party
      7. Shit party.
      8. Yellow Shitstain
      9. Literal Nazis.
    • Fetus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      23 days ago

      If you’re from the US, it isn’t. The Woolworth part of the company was closed and they focussed on sporting goods, whatever is left of the company is now called Foot Locker.

      “Woolworths supermarkets in Australia and New Zealand are operated by Australia’s largest retail company, Woolworths Group, a separate company with no historical links to the F. W. Woolworth Company or Foot Locker, Inc.”

      Copied from Wikipedia.