“May have just legalized murder by one individual”: Experts alarmed at “stunning” SCOTUS ruling - eviltoast
    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      They do, and it will only be “official” when a Republican does it. Once they control the courts, it’s game over. Nothing short of unstacking the court will avert a fascist dictatorship.

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        I do find it amusing that SCOTUS made a ruling that legalizes having them assassinated as an “official act” though. After all, being in contact with intelligence agencies is definitely an official act as is writing pardons, so he can always pardon the assassin(s) afterward.

    • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      They remanded to the lower courts to determine that. But like it does have some implication. They definitely did not say everything the president does is an official action.

      • BertramDitore@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        6 months ago

        And who gets to decide if a lower court decision stands? You guessed it, the Supreme Court. This was always going to be their ultimate decision.

        • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          So doesn’t that mean the US didn’t really ever have separation of powers? Sounds like the door to fascism wasn’t locked and we just used the honour system.

          • BertramDitore@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yeah, that’s unfortunately right. So much of the American system is based on norms and ideals that we trusted our leaders to respect. The Supreme Court has seized their authority, and since they refuse to recognize Congressional oversight (the Chief Justice has regularly refused to appear before Congress), there’s very little we can do.

    • chakan2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Congress. Since Congress isn’t functional, that means whatever the president does is now legal.