“May have just legalized murder by one individual”: Experts alarmed at “stunning” SCOTUS ruling - eviltoast
  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    They remanded to the lower courts to determine that. But like it does have some implication. They definitely did not say everything the president does is an official action.

    • BertramDitore@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      5 months ago

      And who gets to decide if a lower court decision stands? You guessed it, the Supreme Court. This was always going to be their ultimate decision.

      • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        So doesn’t that mean the US didn’t really ever have separation of powers? Sounds like the door to fascism wasn’t locked and we just used the honour system.

        • BertramDitore@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah, that’s unfortunately right. So much of the American system is based on norms and ideals that we trusted our leaders to respect. The Supreme Court has seized their authority, and since they refuse to recognize Congressional oversight (the Chief Justice has regularly refused to appear before Congress), there’s very little we can do.