The debate gets interesting sometimes - eviltoast
  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Yep, not voting is unironically pretty much the same as voting for the party you least want in charge.

    Because you’re making it that much more likely.

    Don’t throw away a right that your ancestors fought for, as it may result in future generations no longer having that right.

    • GraniteM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Hitler’s government was a popular government; the vast majority of Germans preferred the rule of gangsters to the effort of thinking and doing for themselves. They abdicated their franchise.

      […]

      The former Berlin businessman I referred to earlier told me that he blamed his own group, people with the time and the money and the opportunity to know better, for what happened to Germany. “We ignored Hitler,” he said. “We considered him an unimportant fellow, not quite a gentleman, not of our own class. We considered it just a little bit vulgar to bother with him, to bother with politics at all.”

      They thought of the government as “They.” The only possible route to a clear conscience in politics is to accept political responsibility, either as an active member of the party in power or as an equally active member of the loyal opposition.

      —Robert A. Heinlein, Take Back Your Government

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Similarly, MLK saw “the white moderate, who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice” as the biggest impediment to civil rights.

        The bottom line is that being secure enough in your position in society to think you don’t have to engage in politics, or that you can afford to vote your principles instead of tactically, is itself a form of privilege. Those sorts of privileged people think themselves neutral or uninvolved or maybe (in the case of professed leftists refusing to vote Dem as a protest) on their own third side, but the reality is that they are the right-wing authoritarians’ greatest ally every single time.

        • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Lol imagine thinking “moderate white” doesn’t perfectly describe the majority of people walking into the 2020 primaries and voting for Joe Biden.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            You’re not wrong about the primary, but you are wrong to conflate the primary with the general election when it’s the latter that we’re talking about here.

            • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              5 months ago

              Lol so I’m “radical” in the primaries when I don’t vote for Biden but I’m “moderate” in the general when I don’t vote for Biden?

              That’s not how labels work sir.

        • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          The POTUS, from the party most opposed to civil rights act, is who signed it into law, very much so a white moderate more devoted to order. So, I’m gonna take a stance and say MLK was wrong about that one if that was his take before he died.

      • Aqarius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s not how it went, though. It’s, in fact, the opposite of how it went. Hitler had relatively little popular support, but full support of the industrial elite. It’s blaming the people for the crimes of the elite. “They abdicated their franchise” no, fuckface, half of them voted communist. “We ignored Hitler” no, fuckface, you put him in power because you thought he’d be malleable.

        I’m not surprised Heinlein bought it, though. And I’m not surprised people here are buying it.

      • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s funny that both democrats and third party voters will look at your comment and think you’re on their side.

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well, mathematically it’s only half as bad.

      -1 lesser evil +1 greater evil

      Vs.

      -1 lesser evil +0 greater evil

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 months ago

        Your math is wrong. You wouldn’t be cancelling out the greater evil with the vote for the lesser evil, so its actually twice as bad (or 4x what you were thinking).

        0 lesser evil +1 greater evil

        • Glowstick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Exactly.

          There is unfortunately no option to wind up with a non-evil result, your only options are greater evil result or lesser evil result.

          By voting 3rd party you didn’t reduce the chance of greater evil result, AND you didn’t increase the chance of lesser evil result.