

You’re both wrong here. Stop, or you both get a vacation from this community.
You’re both wrong here. Stop, or you both get a vacation from this community.
You’re both wrong here. Stop, or you both get a vacation from this community.
“I never consent to searches”
“I don’t answer questions. Am I detained, or am I free to leave?”
My gut says he’s going to use the ethics in government act as an excuse to dump.
Oi
Crossover:
1 with 3
2 with 6
Not as much as you’d think.
Parent bullet point is the user. Child bullet points are communities they run/ran
I’m another mod of the community. Admiral didn’t let me know they were doing this.
I still 100% support their actions regardless.
If it’s a bug, wow. Almost 250 years, and they can’t fix it?
Also, judges are there to make sure both sides play by the rules.
It’s actually the conclusion of 2 things:
If both hold true, then logically, a jury can make a decision against legal precedent, without fear of repercussion - unless they are paid/coerced to come to that conclusion, and the defendant - once cleared by by a jury - cannot be tried again.
This means that legally, a jury can say GTFO to jury instructions set by judges.
Jury nullification is an important logical conclusion of American jurist rules. This post will stay up.
Pastime*
All you rich people who think you can break any law you want, let this be a warning roadmap
CTV changed the title after this was posted. This was the original title.
I watch this at least once a year!
No. As outlined in this document:
The website and the agreement will be governed by and construed per the laws of the following countries and/or states:
- The Netherlands
- Republic of Finland
- Federal Republic of Germany
This comment was reported.
I get the anger, and there’s no direct threat of violence, so I’m leaving it up.
Sadly, moderation is done by humans, and each person has their own way of moderating. This is why I generally don’t interact in communities I moderate - helps me distance myself from the content I get reports for. I try to look at the rules, and treat them as a “living document” - one that lists the guidelines, but with the understanding it’s the spirit, not the letter that matters at times.
I’ve been moderating this community for a year, and I’ll admit - it’s hard. Moderate too much, and I’m a tyrant. Moderate too little, and “you let every Nazi say what they want here”.
I’m still working on a balance that works best.
is there a point to this?
My original comment was that we have to moderate to keep the site from being taken down. All these arguments change nothing.
It feels like an attack, but I’ll leave that to others to decide.
Please, make this. I have too many communities, or I would