Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youāll near-instantly regret.
Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.
If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutānāpaste it into its own post ā thereās no quota for posting and the bar really isnāt that high.
The post Xitter web has spawned soo many āesotericā right wing freaks, but thereās no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iām talking redscare-ish, reality challenged āculture criticsā who write about everything but understand nothing. Iām talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyāre inescapable at this point, yet I donāt see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnāt be surgeons because they didnāt believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canāt escape them, I would love to sneer at them.
(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)


Woke up to some hashtag spam this morning
which appears to be over of those evolutionary ātransitional formsā between grifts.
The sad thing is the underlying point is almost sound (hoarding data puts you at risk of data breaches, and leaking sensitive data might be Very Bad Indeed) but it is wrapped up in so much overhyped nonsense it is barely visible. Naturally, the best and most obvious fix ā donāt hoard all that shit in the first place ā wasnāt suggested.
(it also appears to be a month-old story, but I guess thereās no reason for mastodon hashtag spammers to be current š«¤)
Is there already a word for āan industry which has removed itself from reality and will collapse when the publicās suspension of disbelief fades awayā?
Calling this just āa bubbleā doesnāt cut it anymore, theyāre just peddling sci-fi ideas now. (Metaverse was a bubble, and it was stupid as hell, but at least those headsets and the legless avatars existed.)
I would actually contend that crypto and the metaverse both qualify as early precursors to the modern AI post-economic bubble. In both cases you had a (heavily politicized) story about technology attract investment money well in excess of anyone actually wanting the product. But crypto ran into a problem where the available products were fundamentally well-understood forms of financial fraud, significantly increasing the risk because of the inherent instability of that (even absent regulatory pressure the bezzle eventually runs out and everyone realizes that all the money in those āreturnsā never existed). And the VR technology was embarrassingly unable to match the story that the pushers were trying to tell, to the point where the next question, whether anyone actually wanted this, never came up.
GenAI is somewhat unique in that the LLMs can do something impressive in mimicking the form of actual language or photography or whatever it was trained on. And on top of that, you can get impressively close to doing a lot of useful things with that, but not close enough to trust it. Thatās the part that limits genAI to being a neat party trick, generating bulk spam text that nobody was going to read anyways, and little more. The economics donāt work out when you need to hire someone skilled enough to do the work to take just as much time double-checking the untrustworthy robot output, and once new investment capital stops subsidizing their operating costs I expect this to become obvious, though with a lot of human suffering in the debris. The challenge of āis this useful enough to justify paying its costsā is the actual stumbling block here. Older bubbles were either blatantly absurd (tulips, crypto) or overinvestment as people tried to get their slice of a pie that anyone with eyes could see was going to be huge (railroad, dotcom). The combination of purely synthetic demand with an actual product is something I canāt think of other examples of, at this scale.
There are many such terms! Just look at the list of articles under āSee Alsoā for āThe Emperorās New Clothesā. My favorite term, not listed there, is ācoyote timeā: āA brief delay between an action and the consequences of that action that has no physical cause and exists only for comedic or gameplay purposes.ā Closely related is the fact that industries donāt collapse when the public opinion shifts, but have a stickiness to them; the guy who documented that stickiness is often quoted as saying, āMarket[s] can remain irrational a lot longer than you [and I] can remain solvent.ā
I happened to learn recently that thatās probably not from Keynes:
https://quoteinvestigator.com/2011/08/09/remain-solvent/
I donāt know if it quite applies here since all the money is openly flowing to nVidia in exchange for very real silicon, but Iām partial to āthe bezzleā - referring to the duration of time between a con artist taking your money and you realizing the money is gone. Some cons will stretch the bezzle out as long as possible by lying and faking returns to try and get the victims to give them even more money, but despite how excited the victims may be about this period the money is in fact already gone.
itās like there was an industry made entirely out of bullshit jobs
If there is, I havenāt heard of it. To try and preemptively coin one, āartificial industryā (āAIā for short) would be pretty fitting - far as I can tell, no industry has unmoored itself from reality like this until the tech industry pulled it off via the AI bubble.
I genuinely forgot the metaverse existed until I read this.
Itās a financial security threat, you see
thatās why you should keep your at-risk data on quantum ai blockchain!!~
linkedin thotleedir posts directly into your mailbox? gonna have to pour one out for you
an absolutely wild grab-bag of words. the more you know about each piece, the more surreal the sentence becomes. unintentional art!
At this point, Iām gonna chalk the refusal to stop hoarding up to ideology more than anything else. The tech industry clearly sees data not as information to be taken sparingly, used carefully, and deleted when necessary, but as Objective Reality Unitstm which are theirs to steal and theirs alone.