Pulling out a pretty solid Tweet @ai_shame showed me:

To pull out a point I’ve been hammering since Baldur Bjarnason talked about AI’s public image, I fully anticipate tech’s reputation cratering once the AI bubble bursts. Precisely how the public will view the tech industry at large in the aftermath I don’t know, but I’d put good money on them being broadly hostile to it.

Ffs I just swapped to Proton for drive and email. Thankfully only done a couple of email migrations.

Its worse for me - I’ve got a metric shitload of emails on Proton. Thankfully, I’m not using them for anything particularly important.

Why do I get the feeling we’re gonna see a colossal tech crash

Yes.

If this gets CUDA open-sourced, I will be one very happy man.

Their radical idea of building a social network that did not require a either VC funding or large amounts of volunteer labour has come to a disappointing, if not entirely surprising end. Going in without a great idea on how to monetise the thing was probably not the best strategy as it turns out.

I never used Cohost, but I know a couple people who do and fuuuuuuuck this sucks. 'Least Newgrounds is still going, though that’s a bit of an apples-to-oranges comparison.

I knew Kagi was kinda screwed the moment the CEO went off like Castle Bravo, but jeez

I’m gonna risk coming off too harsh and say this gaggle of meth microdosing ratfucks don’t deserve rehab, they deserve to rot in jail. Fuck them.

New piece from The Atlantic: A New Tool to Warp Reality (archive)

Turns out the bullshit firehoses undeservedly called chatbots have some capacity to generate a reality distortion field of sorts around them.

eigen “Whipping Blacks who Talk Back” robot

eigen “Replacing Meals on Wheels with Cotton Fields” robot

(If anyone can think up more nicknames like this, go ahead - I have zero intent treating this dumbfuck with any degree of dignity)

You could also ask ChatGPT to make it for you. The idea’s complete garbage unworthy of an actual writer’s time, so I’d let it slide in this case

They’re too stupid to understand anything beyond “the code”, its unsurprising they’re treating it as a technological hammer in a world of nails

Anyway, we tech people really need to learn that being good in tech, and getting tech changes approved is different from being good at modern community management and avoiding the pitfalls of those.

That’d require them to be decent human beings, but from what I’ve seen I’m not counting on it

Not a sneer, but another cool piece from Baldur Bjarnason: The slow evaporation of the free/open source surplus.

Gonna skip straight to near the end, where Baldur lays out a potential apocalypse scenario for FOSS as we know it:

Best case scenario, seems to me, is that Free and Open Source Software enters a period of decline. After all, that’s generally what happens to complex systems with less investment. Worst case scenario is a vicious cycle leading to a collapse:

1. Declining surplus and burnout leads to maintainers increasingly stepping back from their projects.

2. Many of these projects either bitrot serious bugs or get taken over by malicious actors who are highly motivated because they can’t relay on pervasive memory bugs anymore for exploits.

3. OSS increasingly gets a reputation (deserved or not) for being unsafe and unreliable.

4. That decline in users leads to even more maintainers stepping back.

Linking this to a related sneer, another major problem that I can see befalling FOSS is earning a reputation as a Nazi bar. How high that risk is I’m not sure, but between the AI bubble shredding tech’s public image and our very good friends increasingly catching the public’s attention, I suspect those chances are pretty high.

Police officers are starting to use AI chatbots to write crime reports. Will they hold up in court?

Lying to people is the only thing AI is good for, so its no shock that cops want to use it

Update on the creative.ai situation: Ed-Newton Rex just bought the domain.

In other news, AI can now falsify cancer tumours, because even the slight sliver of hope that it could help with cancer treatment had to come with a massive downside

Personal opinion:

(I know I’m probably going too harsh on AI but my patience has completely ran out with this bubble and touching grass can no longer quell he ass-blasting fury it unleashes within me)

Continuing a line of thought I had previously, part of me suspects that SB 1047’s existence is a consequence of the “AI safety” criti-hype turning out to be a double-edged sword.

The industry’s sold these things as potentially capable of unleashing Terminator-style doomsday scenarios orders of magnitude worse than the various ways they’re already hurting everyone, its no shock that it might spur some regulation to try and keep it in check.

Opposing the bill also does a good job of making e/acc bros look bad to everyone around them, since it paints them as actively opposing attempts to prevent a potential AI apocalypse - an apocalypse that, by their own myths, they will be complicit in causing.

Got an extended edit of ‘meet the grahams’ that hits even damn harder than the original

Conservatives in particular have, for culture war reasons, recently recommended Telegram—an “encrypted messaging” app that has many parts that are not encrypted and which does not have a clear governance structure—over Signal, an app that is open source and by all accounts uses one of the strongest encryption protocols ever created, on every chat that happens on the platform.

Refusing to keep your shit secret to own the libs