I’d agree there, and it might be that that’s what they meant, but as you say it still doesn’t leave the two things disconnected. didn’t see them heading in the direction of amusing debate, however!

(I’d wondered from your past writings how long you’d been looking into this shit, TIL the year!)

sorry, all the mental pretzels were taken up by the other poster a few days ago, you’ll have to contort your nonsense yourself. best avoid the history books though, they’ll make it really hard for you to achieve what you want

Did… did you read the piece at all…?

it’s extremely established that it does

Works For Nintendo™

ianal so I’m not really gonna speculate as to effectiveness, impact, or relevance of that. might be the thing by itself, might be opening of a broader set of actions.

legal process is convoluted, lawyers are expensive, lots of entities try “as little” as possible before scaling up - why bother spending a lot when you can spend a little

looks like ghibli has been sending out C&Ds, so there’s a start

you know, I was briefly considering trying to, and I figured you’d probably have to be forcing it by content escaping tricks or something (at least I presume their APIs will do basic type-checking…)

got other yaks to do atm tho

I thought everyone knew that you had to structure prompts in ALGOL 420 to get the best performance by going close to the metal

another classic induncetive reasoning completed successfully!

oh look it’s a loadbearing “just” in the wild. better hope you can shore that fucker up with some facts

Try writing it out in ASCII

my poster in christ, what in the fuck are you on about. stop prompting LLMs and go learn some things instead

some other weird way that it hasn’t been specifically trained on and I bet it actually performs better

“no no see, you just need to prompt it different. just prompt it different bro it’ll work bro I swear bro”

god, every fucking time

no-one fucking asked you to spam us with pointless llm trash

the fuck is wrong with you

what

(and as in: this kind of recurring fraudy misrepresentation is very personal - takes a human to lie like that)

((maybe if the promptfans showed me a prompt lying like this I could take them even slightly seriously? alas))

I’m hoping (but it might’ve been juuuust a bit too early for it to be all-parts applicable)

so you’re not saying something, but saying something not-that? ish? sorta? if one squints? with no detail?

wow, wonderful contribution. brb calling Plato to inform them of their dethroning in the face of your mighty reason

think there was a mod note a while ago (@dgerard? I think?) that nsfw was no longer required

also reminds you about upcoming meetings and gives a weather summary

guessing (…hoping) you meant this with /s but not really the place for this sort of comment tbh

practical downside: too easily seen as a mockumentary

oh cute, the clown cites[0] POPIA in their wallspaghetti, how quaint

(POPIA’s an advancement, on paper. In practice it’s still……not working well. source: me, who has tried to make use of it on multiple occasions. won’t get into details tho)

[0] fsvo