In a last-minute decision, White House decides not to terminate NASA employees - eviltoast

Summary

The White House unexpectedly decided not to terminate over 1,000 probationary NASA employees on Tuesday, despite similar cuts at other federal agencies.

NASA had requested exemptions, but it’s unclear why the reprieve was granted. Some speculate that Jared Isaacman, Trump’s nominee to lead NASA, may have intervened.

While this decision spares employees for now, the administration is still considering significant workforce reductions in the coming months.

NASA field centers have been instructed to prepare for possible layoffs, though final decisions may require congressional approval.

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    21 days ago

    We think airplanes crashing is bad for PR. A Nasa failure being credited to Trump would be catastrophic.

    • some_designer_dude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      21 days ago

      Why? Nothing sticks to Trump. Nothing bad that happens is going to be his fault, ever, in the glazed eyes of his moronic followers. He’s firing a bunch of educated weenies? Nice! Got ‘em. That’ll teach them to think they’re smarter than everyone else. Who’s a rocket scientist now?!

  • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    22 days ago

    Not the EPA, not the Dept. of Education, but NASA, the place they’ve been cutting the funding for 40 years. It really is the Nerd Reich.

    • chingadera@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      21 days ago

      Nah these aren’t nerds, they don’t make or do anything aside from spending insane amounts of money to make even more insane amounts of money.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    Meanwhile at the space station… Stranded astronauts desperately build a parachute using their clothes, duct tape (the good stuff, not that home depot crap) and USB cables. They must make the hard decision to decide who should jump and who should remain in space… Forever!

        • DancingBear@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          Is it worse to go sideways into the atmosphere or straight down?

          (Assuming you had the however many years of oxygen with you to make the journey, etc.)

          I assume it would be better to just stay on the station and enjoy the sunsets and moonrises and I bet you get random eclipses too

          Just asking because… if I have the oxygen maybe I could use it to lower my velocity of orbit or whatever speed that high is called until I fall straight down.

          I don’t know how velocity works if I was going sideways at 17,000 mph and I sprayed the oxygen in front of me I would probably start to fall faster immediately that’s weird gravity and shit, I don’t know the correlation between gravity and speed

          10 mph per second … per second? It accelerates so maybe close enough

  • Lenny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    22 days ago

    Asteroid is like “ok I’ll go back down to 2.3%, but don’t try that again”