So who again? Were they the subject of conversation?

I was paraphrasing your own comment. Get some empathy.

What a gross conjecture: she shouldn’t care because those people aren’t physical close

Man you seem pretty happy about it, almost like you want your country to suffer.

Can I be a jerk in retaliation?

You didn’t watch the video apparently

Corp profits have increased while costs have also increased, so the same dollars in 1990 buy less things now.

The jobs pay nothing and expect expensive degrees to work them. I will direct you to the wages vs productivity growth graph…

She is awesome

Was ist das

Just DM someone with an A and you are good

This only outs you if there’s a single incident of this ever across all of the Victorian noodle houses in America presumably, which I doubt is the case considering gentrification and such

Yeah I could have been more explicit, being different is nothing to be punished over. It’s also specifically illegal.

The principal told Ty’s mom in an email that if Ty said something similar again, the school would follow the same protocol.

Instead of the principal having a single brain cell capable of empathy, they decided that instead of engaging with the child and treating them with respect, they will catastrophize the child’s colloquialisms into intentional bomb threats.

They know the child has used the term “blow up” to mean “blow up emotionally”/the child is in trouble. They are intentionally punishing the child for nothing.

It helped us out

I don’t really think you’ve thought about it if you can write that out… Those both are basically equivalent. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/injury.htm

Literally everyone should worry about that.

Does anybody drop off their children at school? Do they cross the street? Do they travel?

Pedestrian hostile cars are an everybody issue.

Period tracking is a very good tool for understanding your health. Issues may be spotted very early in some cases.

If it’s required for preventative healthcare, the blame is solely on the exploitative app operators for any data safety concerns.

That’s dumb when there’s no intent or mishandling from one of them.

It’s also not a crime to unknowingly possess classified material, which was the case for the one that wasn’t deliberately hiding them after being ordered to give them back.

Almost like the one that was persecuted meant to do it, and the one that followed the law did not… Hmmmmmm what a crazy miscarriage of justice/s

Yeah refusing to hand them over, obscuring the locations of the documents and losing them had nothing to do with it/s