Goodbye [System32 Comics] - eviltoast
  • NutWrench@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Advertisers abused the hell out of us back in the early days of the Internet and we haven’t forgotten. Multiple Pop-ups, pop-unders and seizure-inducing banner ads.

    If they simply stuck with small, basic, non-flashing banners, I could have handled it. But greed knows no limits with advertisers.

    • yamanii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Yep, they brought it upon themselves, I still remember as a kid falling for a “you are the visitor number 1 million” and getting a virus; and now we have porn and cults advertising on youtube, nothing changed.

    • tehmics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      You got any blacklists that catch YouTube and twitch ads? Afaik those are provided from their own cdn now, so dns won’t work unless I’m mistaken

  • pathief@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I often wonder how news websites are supposed to survive. People (myself included) want unbiased news websites without paywalls and ads.

    How are they supposed to pay their staff?

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      News sites are in need of a paradigm shift.

      I think we might get to a system where summaries of news are free, but indepth articles and videos are paid.

      Oh and I believe that news sites should scrap subscription only models, I should be able to pay 1-2EUR for a single article that I want to read, with no risk of the payment being a subscription.

      Obviously subscriptions models should still be an alternative if the users want it.

      • tehmics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I’d happily pay a nominal fee for news that was unbiased reporting of facts rather than opinion, and didn’t bombard me with ads or sell my data. It just doesn’t exist so I use aggregators to get a general vibe across sources.

    • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I’m fine with ads when they don’t take up half my screen or try and shift the page to to trick me into clicking on them, should a stuck with sidebar adds.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      If your website is a business, you need to have a business model. If your business model isn’t sustainable, because it relies on not annoying visitors too much, maybe look for a better one.

      Btw, most newspages have adapted some 10 years ago already, showing the important news for free and additional details with paid account. A lot have the balance off tho.

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Subscription models. Some sites even combine some free articles with it, so that anyone can look into their works, but not necessarily everything. If it fits you, you get a subscription. Sort of the same way people would pay for their daily newspaper.

      It can be argued that “news” should be free, and there are some news site that are basically picking up AP/AFP/whatever and repost these, but actual journalism do requires work.

    • Fiona@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      21 hours ago

      The honest answer are general fees like they are used for public broadcasters. It’s not a perfect system either and it requires significant effort to keep things neutral, but overall it seems to have the best results if you compare the quality of the outcome.

    • Donkter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The best business model is one that allows users to pay what they want. Unfortunately that means most of these sites would go out of business, which is not what they want so they’ll keep forcing more and more invasive ads on people until the dam truly breaks.

  • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    17 hours ago

    It really depends on:

    1. How intrusive the ads are
    2. If there is other invasive tracking
    3. How “corporate” the website is (SEO garbage AI spam vs genuine indie blogger)
    4. The quality of the article

    But for some reason, 75% of the time I decide to willingly turn off my ad blocker, there’s nothing to block.

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    ublocks’ annoyance list blocks most of these warnings and more.

    i suggest you enable them as its not on by default.

    • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      AdGuard does on iOS as well, as long as you’re using Safari. Doesn’t work on other browsers.

      I think AdGuard subscribes to the same annoyances list.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    163
    ·
    1 day ago

    Basically how I browse the internet these days … if I have to click on a bunch of stuff, sign up, register, accept a bunch of notifications, cookies, blah, blah, blah … all because I want to read 200 words on your dumb site … I’m not even going to bother with your site, skip and find a different source that is easier.

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I go a step further and block them in DDG. This includes any “article” I have to scroll through to find the answer.

    • archonet@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      Get PopUpOFF and AdNauseam. Don’t just back down without a fight. If I need to read an article to find some information I am going to read it, dumb bullshit be damned, even if I have to break half your site to do so. I’ve even been spiteful enough to hack away at the page with inspect element if it still manages to get past those add-ons.

      • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        Generally for news websites … especially highly rated ones that are supposed to be the best professional outfits … if I can’t use ‘reader view’ and just read your copy … I’m skipping your site and never going back to you.

        All I want to do is read the news … you don’t need to sell me on a great refrigerator or a cigarette lighter that has a flame that can melt steel because I’m never going to buy it.

        • archonet@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          NoScript tends to break more things on the page than is desired, in my experience, I used to use it but eventually I got rid of it because of the hassle of “is this the one I should add an exception for to make it work? No. How about this one?” repeat until you figure it out, and then repeat the whole process for every website you ever use

          Using AdNauseam’s built-in uBlock, I can use its element picker if something is particularly stubborn

          Don’t get me wrong, I like NoScript as a concept and think it should exist for the subset of users who want that functionality, but it’s not for me.

  • Aneb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Umm I was reading the comments, does nobody else go into the page’s HTML and delete the “pay now” popup. Usually deleting the code works for me. Let me know if you have a way that works for you!

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      20 hours ago

      That sounds like a lot of work. On sites where that work (which is not all of them, some are made by competent people), firefox “reading mode” just do the job.

    • tehmics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I’d rather just leave if I hit a pay wall, I want to hit their metrics. but I have a huge amount of blocked elements via ublock and a handful of my own tampermonkey scripts for frequently used sites

    • Mr. Satan@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 day ago

      Depends, some pages don’t actually load the full content. Removing the paywall pop-up doesn’t really work then.

      • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        There are some websites you can use to avoid a paywall for a newspaper sites, sometimes even loading the otherwise hidden content when removing the paywall code or manually removing the paywall overlay using an ad blocker. I forgot the one I used to use, but I found a Reddit post about it.

    • Fleppensteyn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Sometimes the reading mode bypasses paywalls and popups.

      Also make sure to block “annoyances” in uBlock.

      For the rest, I’m using the Nuke Anything extension.

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I guess a lot of people have a strange aversion towards messing with the code of websites. Which is weird and dumb, it’s downloaded to your browser, it’s not running on their system, you’re free to mess with it as much as you want. Best to familiarize yourself with the Web developer tools, they can be an effective weapon against scammy sites which use deceptive methods like this.

      • InputZero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Plus the worst thing that can happen is the webpage crashes, just hit reload and you’re back baby! It’s the safest environment to fuck around with code. A person would have to go out of their way to actually make a problem, maybe some random kid too. They get into everything.

    • newcockroach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I used to do that but it turns out ublock has a option for that!! When u click on the ublock plugin that is a thunder symbol option which u can use to delete any element on the page. 🙃

    • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Generally the first thing I try is to hit ESC to stop a paywall script from running.

      If that doesn’t work I try pressing ctrl-A ctrl-C to copy the whole page as soon as I see something. This works on pages that load and are then hidden by a script, but you have to be quick. Then I open Notepad and paste. If this doesn’t work I’ll either try it once more and see if I can be faster or just say screw it, if they want to hide their content that bad I don’t need it. If it’s important to me google will usually find the same news or info somewhere else.

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I’ve found this rarely works myself, due to them disabling other parts of the page, it’s less hassle to just find the article elsewhere

    • NeuronautML@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      My less tech savy younger family members have learned to completely ignore ads, wait for the skip button and effectively avoid all the false skip buttons on account of playing mobile games with ads since they were babies. Advertisers have perfected the human brain of people who rawdog the internet to be incapable of retaining any information from any ad they see and finding skip buttons wherever they may be.

      From my personal observational account, i think I’ve only seen boomers and some older millennials ever interacting with ads. A gen alpha’s brain wouldn’t even remember an ad they just saw. They have perfected filtering them.

      • helloworld55@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        Ads work differently than that. At least good ones do.

        A good ad is almost imperceptible in presenting an idea to you. I have no doubt that people that are bombarded with ads that they say they “ignore” are still influenced over not having seen the ad at all

  • linearchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 day ago

    I will try to unblock ads on a new site one time. I want to see the whole article on one page, No click-through gallery of 27 different takes. There can be ads in the borders and margins. And maybe if I’m feeling generous one in the middle of the content. I don’t want to see an unrelated pop-up video I don’t want to see every paragraph separated by another ad.

    If they can’t play nice I block the ads, If I can’t, by default, see the content without the ads, I’ll find the article on another service. Everyone’s literally just copying the same content back and forth with different wording.

    If I can’t see the content, and I can’t find it on another service, I’ll generally use bypass paywalls clean. If I can’t see it through that I don’t see it.

    I’m not giving in for this b******* ads all over the place scenario. You can’t even read a recipe page nowadays without an ad blocker.

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 day ago

    Someday soon my “adblocker” might be a personal AI that reads the spam-ridden website on a virtual display in memory, identifies the actual content while pretending to look at whatever ads the site demands, and then passes the information I’m actually looking for along to me. Good luck captchaing that.

    • slaacaa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      An AI feature actually useful for consumers? Corporate overloards say no thx, let’s instead fill the net with more AI-generated SEO bullshit

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      І ԁоո’t раrtісulаrly thіոk thаt summаrіzеrs аrе а gооԁ gоаl, sіոсе аі summаrіеs саո оftеո bе wrоոg, mіsіոtеrрrеt іոfоrmаtіоո, оr оmіt іmроrtаոt іոfоrmаtіո thеy fаіl tо іԁеոtіfy аs іmроrtаոt.

      I think if that starts to become common people should start using tools like this as well as the use of pre-baked PDF or image rendered text to thwart it on their content.

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I’m not talking about a summarizer, I’m talking about a classifier. It just needs to identify which parts of the page are advertising and which are not.

        The point of such a tool is that it would read the web page in exactly the same way that a human would, so using trickery like pre-rendered images of text or funky unicode wouldn’t really change anything. If a human can read it then so can the AI.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    It turns out the popular alternative is “force you to sign up (with a phone number) from critical mass/FOMO, track the snot out of you then slide ads in later.” Oh, and the stuff you want is siloed away until you join, and buried in a mountain of rambling and engagement optimization junk.

    Note that I’m largely talking about Discord, which is unfortunately where many of my interests have been shunted off to. People talk about Facebook, Google and OpenAI eating the internet, but I feel like Discord is the quiet trojan horse.

      • BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Discord is 1000x worse because entire communities have taken to moving onto there. It’s like the one thing that’s worse than moving everything to Reddit: people using a fancy chat service like a forum. Everything from hardware to games seems to have most of the community on Discord; incredibly unhelpful if I’m trying to troubleshoot something.

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          It’s unbelievavly time inefficient for… anything.

          And its incredibly engaging. I burnt through so much time shooting the breeze in hopes of actually finding something interesting, notification spam, checking channels… It’s why I deleted it from everywhere. And it left a gaping hole in my life, because its the only place some niche communities exist now.

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    That’s just fine as far as the site is concerned.

    They provide content that is paid for by ads. When you block the ads, you’re using up bandwidth and not contributing to the site’s revenue. They want you gone.

    • GladiusB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      We want them gone. The market goes where the users use it. The Internet did not have the advertising presence it does now when it was conceived. Saying they want us gone means they are the only game in town. They aren’t. They are too big for their britches and need to realize the users dictate the usage.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Rose-colored glasses, dude.

        The internet was full of never-ending pop-ups that opened 2 more windows every time you closed one 25-30 years ago, and the viruses they carried fucked your computer to the point you had to do a clean Windows install. Spam.filters didn’t work and you’d get 500 unfiltered spam messages a day, and since you were on 28-56k using a POP3 system it took an hour to download them before you could sort through them.

        Shit’s bad now, but it was way, way worse back then.

          • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            I talk about the prevalence of online ads 30 years ago when Linux was first getting a GUI and wasn’t supported by any major hardware companies, and you respond with this bullshit?

            Fuck right off with that argument.

            You didn’t just move the goalpost you changed fields, leagues, and sports.

            • GladiusB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Almost like I saw the issue and resolved it with knowledge rather than being a victim. If you want to continue to be an asshole about it, you can fuck off with being too stupid to see that shit is different when you can see through the BS ahead of time.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        The Internet did not have the advertising presence it does now when it was conceived.

        Do you mean back when it was only the government and universities connected to it, before the web existed? Those times were very different. Practically user was contributing to the internet some way, either through time (like actually creating the software to use it, and once the web existed, creating sites) or money.

        These days, there’s a significantly larger number of freeloaders that want everything for free, without contributing anything back. So far, advertising has been the only effective model to support such users that don’t want to pay.

    • NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Peak monetisation. Don’t let them even see the article [copied from another website and run through ChatGPT] until they fork over the entrance fee.

    • save_the_humans@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      At least you won’t use up that bandwidth routing traffic through pihole. You also get a nice cache for faster loading on frequented sites.