Harris' lead over Trump narrows to 46% vs 43%, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds - eviltoast
    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yeah…I thought you might be reasonable, but this? This proves you aren’t reasonable.

      Can you try again but this time not violate this subs rules?

      I didn’t bother reading the rest when the very first sentence is an insult

      Edit:

      Rule 3 in case you can’t see the sidebar:

      Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

      • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I just called you unreasonable. We’ll see if the mods think that’s a violation of the TOS. Have a nice life, either way.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative)

          It’s literally right there…

          By your own admission:

          I just called you unreasonable

          That’s against civility rules.

          But what I said still stands, if you try again without the civility breaking parts, I’m willing to spend some time to help you understand.