Harris' lead over Trump narrows to 46% vs 43%, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds - eviltoast
  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Yeah…I thought you might be reasonable, but this? This proves you aren’t reasonable.

    Can you try again but this time not violate this subs rules?

    I didn’t bother reading the rest when the very first sentence is an insult

    Edit:

    Rule 3 in case you can’t see the sidebar:

    Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

    • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I just called you unreasonable. We’ll see if the mods think that’s a violation of the TOS. Have a nice life, either way.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative)

        It’s literally right there…

        By your own admission:

        I just called you unreasonable

        That’s against civility rules.

        But what I said still stands, if you try again without the civility breaking parts, I’m willing to spend some time to help you understand.