Uncommitted movement: Trump remains biggest threat, not Democrats - eviltoast
  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    “However, that’s not to say that White House officials or Democratic Party staff have heeded their calls for an immediate and permanent ceasefire, an arms embargo on Israel, and a lifting of the 17-year-old blockade on the Gaza Strip.”

    The White House has absolutely zero control over an immediate and permanent cease fire, or lifting the Gaza blockade, that’s all on Israel to do and they’re not interested.

    We could enact an arms embargo, which would do nothing. Israel would continue producing their own weapons and obtain more from equally “on the outs” nations.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        3 months ago

        No, because if we stop supporting Israel, there’s a non-zero chance they’ll go to someone worse for support, like Putin.

        • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          …so your argument is that we should keep supporting a genocidal regime because they might go ask someone worse than us for help? “We need to help them kill innocent people or someone else might” is probably the worst take I think I’ve ever heard from someone outside of the republican party, and it’s a close one on that front.

          • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            Pretty much, yeah, the Evangelical vote requires we maintain support of Israel because Jeebus could come back any day now, whoever alienates them is out, and fast.

    • ASDraptor@lemmy.autism.place
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      They have power all right. It’s quite simple: tell the nazi that he’s on his own. That’s it. The moment the nazi loses his “I’ll call dad” card, we’ll see how well he goes in the territory.

    • BakerBagel@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      The White House was able to bring down a shit ton of sanctions on Russia after the invasion of Ukraine. There iia no reason they couldn’t do the same after Israel began razing Gaza.

    • Hegar@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      White House has absolutely zero control over an immediate and permanent cease fire, or lifting the Gaza blockade, that’s all on Israel

      The white house has plenty of influence over israel, they’ve just chosen to green light the genocide and netanyahu’s regional escalation against the advice of our own experts.

      An arms embargo would empower anti-netanyahu voices in israel who could point to his mismanaging of israel’s most important bilateral. It would reduce the rate and kind of weapons the idf could bring to bear against civilians, saving lives.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Because he knows Biden will support him anyway. If Biden had some balls Netanyahu would never be able to do that shit.