Devs gaining little (if anything) from AI coding assistants - eviltoast

“Many developers say AI coding assistants make them more productive, but a recent study set forth to measure their output and found no significant gains. Use of GitHub Copilot also introduced 41% more bugs, according to the study from Uplevel”

study referenced: Can GenAI Actually Improve Developer Productivity? (requires email)

  • cerement@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    seems a lot of people are using AI as a replacement for search since Google search has become such garbage

    • Clent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yep. I think looking back it’s going to be clear Google chose the wrong time to lean into enshittification of their algorithm. Further, their habit of abandoning products will cause people to choose other LLM solutions first.

    • El Barto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Last time I tried to look up how to fenagle a dingle, Google showed me ads about how to friffle bahoonies for two pages, and finally out showed me the dingle fenagling algorithm in the ancient Expert Sex Change website.

    • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The main thing here is its like another level of the little preview you get of websites. So like original web surfing look through links, next level was scroll through synopsis of the links, now its look at the synopsis of syopsis of most relevant links. Again though I worry about the energy costs. I how the hardware can midigate this but at least does serve some useful function unlike bitcoin.