France to ban female students from wearing abayas in state schools - eviltoast
  • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    As an American this is difficult to comprehend. I’m feeling culture shock. Maybe the first xenophobia I’ve experienced in years.

    • tal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      France doesn’t have the First Amendment. I mean, I don’t much think that this is a good idea either, but different country, different system of government.

      • Turun@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        For what it’s worth, As a German I don’ t particularly like the right to free speech as it exists in the US. It allows way too much, including harmful things. E.g. in Germany it is not allowed to glorify the Holocaust. I’m pretty sure such a thing would be allowed as free speech in the US.

        • idiomaddict@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m an American living in Germany. It’s not honestly much different in effect. In the US I could insult a police officer as much as I want (but you know… if I choose the wrong one they’ll fucking kill me), whereas it’s illegal in Germany. There’s a lot of things like that, where there’s technically the freedom to do something but it doesn’t really mean freedom

          • letmesleep@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yeah, you kinda privatized speech control. It*s interesting that in the US people can get easily fired over things they said on social media. In Germany that’s harder. Not just because of legal protections (there are some, but they’re not that strong) but also because there’s an understanding that what can and cannot be said shouldn’t be decided by people on Twitter/X but by the law.

            • idiomaddict@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Yup. There’s also a much stronger line between your work life and your private life. It’s wild to me (not bad, just very unexpected) that people with drug possession charges don’t lose their jobs here, even office workers or teachers

              • letmesleep@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                That people with drug possession charges don’t lose their jobs here, even office workers or teachers

                Especially those. For criminal things to become relevant they have to be connected to the job at hand. Hence drugs would be mainly an issue in areas where you operate heavy machinery.

                Fun fact: You are allowed to lie about your criminal past in job interviews if it’s those are not connected to the job. Hence any smart employer will only ask whether you were convicted of anything that is relevant to them. Otherwise firing you will be expensive. And of course it’s also hard to employers to find out whether an employee has any criminal convictions. Afaik only a few select areas, e.g. the arms industry and kindergartens (the later look for sex and violence related crimes, not drugs), actually check criminal records and they do have to get permission from you or you’ll even have to get the documents (“Führungszeugnis”) yourself.

          • anlumo@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            There are entire YouTube channels dedicated to people who film themselves screaming profanities at police officers in the US to get them to do something illegal.

            This group of people calls themselves First Amendment Auditors.