Historian who predicted 9 of the last 10 election results says Democrats shouldn't drop Joe Biden - eviltoast

He got 2000 “wrong”… Or did he?

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Since then, his signature legislation has failed to pass as intended, he’s broken a strike, he’s supported a genocide, he’s moved to the right on immigration, and he’s claimed to have defeated Medicare. He’s alienated his base and demonstrated that people who were fretting about his age might have been on to something after all.

    He beat Trump in a nail-biting squeaker of a contest in 2020, and centrists have been pretending he’s invincible ever since.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Oh boohoo, my team didn’t win everything it wanted so I’m going to take my ball and go home.

        Your team didn’t? Did Biden not move far enough to the right for you?

        Still by far the most progressive president in my lifetime.

        I see. He really isn’t far enough to the right for you. Well you should vote for him anyway. No matter who and all that.

        • Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I’ve never met a single person who thinks any of them could actually get the popular or electoral vote, at this point replacing Biden with another Democrat would be far more likely.

            • Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              About 25 to 50 percent, depending on which Polling Aggregate source you’re using for Biden currently. Which would presumably improve with another candidate.

              25% From the economist

              40% From The Hill

              50% From 538

              Meanwhile, RFK Jr., the highest polling of the third party candidates, has less than 1% chance of winning enough electoral votes.

              However, my original point wasn’t that a Biden replacement would do better than RFK or a third party in the general (though they certainly would), but that if you dislike Biden, him being replaced is more likely than a third party candidate ever winning.

              • DMBFFF@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Before the debate, I wasn’t sure who’d win: Biden or Trump.

                Even Allen Lichtman was unsure.

                After the debate, I figure Biden will lose.

                I’m not saying it’s an absolute certainty—we have 4 months and many things could happen. If someone offered to bet me their $500 that Trump will win to my $100 on Biden winning, I’d take it.

                If Biden is replaced, I think he’d be more likely to lose.

                If he was elected, Biden needn’t serve all 4 years: he could resign a few months later, make Harris President, and AOC, Sanders, Newsom, whatever, as VP.

                As I think Biden will lose, one might want to vote their hearts.

                Keep in mind, it might be dependent on states.

                wp:2020 United States presidential election#Results by state

                If 2.5 million Californians who voted for Biden instead voted for RJK Jr, Stein, and West in 2024, Biden (or his replacement) would still probably win all 55 Electoral College votes of that state.

                If the 5 million Texans who voted for Biden, also, instead voted RJK Jr, Stein, and West in 2024, Biden would lose no more Electoral College votes.