The debate gets interesting sometimes - eviltoast
  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    we can at least implement Approval Voting

    No, you can’t. You do not have the power to implement Approval Voting, and nobody who does have the power wants to do it. So it’s not gonna happen, at least not in the short term. Right now, anybody who wins has to win in an environment of First Past the Post. Nobody capable of doing that currently supports Approval Voting, so right now it is effectively not on the ballot.

    This is what I mean about “hav[ing] a viable strategy.” Magically wishing Approval Voting into existence ain’t it.

    • Liz@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well the strategy is to work your way up from the local level because:

      1. It’s easier for people to make change at the local level, Fargo and St. Louis have already done it.

      2. Politicians tend to work their way up the ladder, and will be more open to using the system at higher levels if they already proved they can win under that system.

      You have to remember that any real social change takes years, even decades of organized to realize. We didn’t go from Jim Crowe to the civil rights act in a fortnight, it took big organizations applying decades of pressure in multiple different ways.

      If you want to be a part of the solution, join an organization dedicated to improving things. It doesn’t have to be the one I linked, but Election Science is the one working on approval voting. Local elections are such that one highly motivated person can build and run the organization to flip their local election laws, it could be you, but it won’t happen overnight.