What an original post that you've thought up here... - eviltoast
  • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The “blasphemy” was actually treason and sedition. That’s why the Romans executed him instead of the Jewish clergy.

    Though it is worth noting at the time that denying the Emperor was a god was all three, blasphemy, treason, and sedition, and it was also something the Jewish faith demanded they do, but all the Jewish leaders at the time broke that religious law to keep their positions and general state of not being crucified.

    The blasphemy-only retelling, and implying it was blasphemy against the Jewish religion, is Roman Catholic revisionism to deflect blame from, you know, the Roman state after they became the dominant religion and gained its support.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      The “blasphemy” was actually treason and sedition. That’s why the Romans executed him instead of the Jewish clergy.

      That and the Roman’s didn’t like non-Roman’s doing executions. They didn’t care about mystics running around doing all sorts of weird things. But they did care about all the bodies being left lying around. (It was untidy.)

      There were a lot of Jewish mystics cropping up at the time, Jesus was just one cult of many- though his cult actually survived long enough to become a religion.