Is there a more politically and ideologically diverse alternative for Lemmy? - eviltoast

I know the real answer is reddit but I really don’t want to go back now that I’ve already grown used to life without it. I was hoping for Lemmy to be a viable substitute but it isn’t. I can see how this place is wonderful for the certain type of person but that person is not me. My experience during the past 6+ months has been a net negative and I’m pretty much ready to move on. I just don’t know where else to go.

  • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    “America does bad things, so I should support china/russia instead!”

    “Stalin/mao were (anything besides utterly reprehensible dictators)”

    “Communism could’ve worked if-“

    Honorable mention to thinking this coy “I’m going to act all hyper respectful and yet also like I know more than anyone about anything” bullshit gets you anywhere.

    • msage@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      Though to be honest, tankies spouting #1 and #2 get heavily downvoted. I don’t even see them anymore, guess my instance defederated them, but they were never strong positions here.

      Perhaps it’s the defederation, but my experience here does not resemble yours.

      • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        They’re mask off on hexbear/lemmygrad, they try to be subversive on lemmy.ml. I have in fact instance blocked the first two, you can usually dodge them on .ml. Lemmy is far less enjoyable if you have not blocked them.

      • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Commune-ism sounds like a lovely idea on a small scale, you gotta solve a lot of political problems to make it work on anything bigger. Social democracies like the scandinavians seem to be the best way we currently know to run a humanitarian society.

        • msage@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Are they though? I just feel like we aren’t solving the issues we ought to.

          First, nobody gets hungry ever again.

          Then, everybody gets roof over their head.

          After that, we can start discussing the next steps.

          And yes, we need to do this globally, with nobody left behind.

          • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            That’s neither exclusive to communism nor has it been achieved in most purportedly communist states (I hear Vietnam’s actually been having a good run of things but I can’t speak to specifics).

            Socialism != communism.

            • msage@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              It’s definitely not happening now under any social democracy.

              Socialism is supposed to be a transformative period, leading to communism. I have no idea why people write the !=.

              • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                8 months ago

                Because exclusively that’s the communist viewpoint. There are different socialist ideologies than communism. It’s a rectangle vs square situation.

                  • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    “Socialism will transition to communism” is just a communism thing. Social democracy is different. It doesn’t involve communism. Because communism is cringe.

          • Thorny_Insight@lemm.eeOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            That is not an unthinkable scenario. The universe is so vast yet there is no sign of life anywhere else. Why? Perhaps intelligent life simply isn’t intelligent enough and they always end up destroying themselves. A so called “great filter”. Is it behind us or ahead? Who knows.

            • msage@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              Given the state of our climate, I would say it’s very closely ahead of us, and we are not going to make it. Which is a shame, we are so close.

                • msage@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Right now I don’t see how our current society can survive. We are doing nothing at all to stop burning fossil fuels (renewables go up, but so does fossil burning), the richest find more and more absurd ways to waste energy (bitcoin, LLMs), everywhere more and more people go poor even in developed nations (prices skyrocketing, mainly food and rent), and we are just starting to see that climate is starting to change, and not to our optimistic scenarios.

                  I don’t think we are going to make it.

                  • Thorny_Insight@lemm.eeOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    For me it’s more about the political climate. I don’t see the actual climate change as an existential threat to the human race in a way something like nuclear war, a pandemic, asteroid or AI could be. It’s bad but it’s not that bad. I never really understood why so many seem to think this way when I don’t even hear scientists making such apocalyptic claims.

      • Wrench@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        There’s a bunch of very active non-ml users that always turn any political discussion to “both sides are terrible, don’t vote for genocide”.

        Once you start recognizing names (or blocking), it gets less depressing. But it does feel like there are a lot more fascist enablers in the political communities than there really are, just because of how fervent those few users are.

        • irreticent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Once you start recognizing names

          One of my favorite features of the Boost app is they allow you to tag a username with whatever label you want. It really helps to highlight the users that regularly argue in bad faith, troll, etc.