All of that happens the exact opposite way when you compare Writer with Word.

And Presenter compared to Power Point has the clear answer that you shouldn’t use either.

Either way, Excel is the one good piece of software in MS Office. Has always been, and I don’t expect it to change in the future. (Except maybe if they decide to make Excel bad.) But that’s only as long as it always corrupting anything mildly complex doesn’t bother you.

In a 1918 theater, it probably makes no difference whatsoever.

Has anybody actually looked at the paper instead of reacting to The Guardian’s reaction?

Because as bad as the Nobel Prize Committee is at their job, that doesn’t look like something you would find in one.

You don’t see the relation between those?

for the less intelligent folks

Yeah, ok.

Global warming doesn’t care if you like the news or not.

To escape their wrath.

Nobody can convince me that’s a good format.

The “battles [1][7][8][9][31][42][44][45][47][64][65][67][68][83][99]” format is superior and I’ll die on that hill!

Your muscles’ efficiency varies widely on short exercise bursts, and very little on long, constant sessions.

It’s not clear to me what the bike is calibrated to, I’d say it’s correct to set it for long sessions, but I’d expect them to vary widely from one mode to another.

As long as it’s not a water poodle…

Also, by the way, technically you can quote any predicate as a consequence of a false one.

I don’t know if the people that made this phrase knew that, but it’s technically correct :)

Yeah, I can agree with that. And somebody will eventually find some way to use that mismatch against people.

But the correct language doesn’t have an impact, and we don’t decide what gets popular anyway. I don’t like that phrase either (I think it’s too conservative), but it’s here to stay.

They can block some kinds of server-side ads. And if google has those already, they have been quite successful against youtube.

But yeah, they won’t block all server-side ads.

That phrase means “if you will make an enemy out of me and won’t let me buy the kind of ownership I want, I’ll take it and ignore paying you”.

But notice that the full explanation is longer? That phrase captures perfectly well the antagonizing perspective, and nobody goes around making sure they pay fairly the people that treat them as enemies. It also fails to capture any other bit of the logic, but it’s ok, the logic is simple and automatic once the antagonism is explicitated.

By “does work” you mean you don’t need to care about the anchors flying around and falling over you; you only have to care about the lines cutting you in half or that wood house breaking down when pressed against them?

If so, yeah, round and deep concrete tubes work.

I fully expect people to keep using a broken Xorg, not move into wayland, and not fork and keep it updated.

But the devs are free to do whatever they want. No opinions there. I wouldn’t want to maintain Xorg either.

I have that people post those and I don’t doubt they are real anymore.

Now I’m just curious about what shape those anchors have, due to morbid curiosity.

The hamas is not a government.

Hum… In Gaza they used to be exactly a government. Not a democratic one, but one imposed by Israel.

… what I’m sure the GP wouldn’t like to hear either.

Yep, I wrote it badly.

He’s publicly accusing Israel of supporting Trump. He didn’t publicly accuse them of anything before that.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11354908/?ref_=ttep_ep8

I guess the VFX reference isn’t widely known, nor it’s direct enough.