Is there a more politically and ideologically diverse alternative for Lemmy? - eviltoast

I know the real answer is reddit but I really don’t want to go back now that I’ve already grown used to life without it. I was hoping for Lemmy to be a viable substitute but it isn’t. I can see how this place is wonderful for the certain type of person but that person is not me. My experience during the past 6+ months has been a net negative and I’m pretty much ready to move on. I just don’t know where else to go.

  • msage@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Are they though? I just feel like we aren’t solving the issues we ought to.

    First, nobody gets hungry ever again.

    Then, everybody gets roof over their head.

    After that, we can start discussing the next steps.

    And yes, we need to do this globally, with nobody left behind.

    • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s neither exclusive to communism nor has it been achieved in most purportedly communist states (I hear Vietnam’s actually been having a good run of things but I can’t speak to specifics).

      Socialism != communism.

      • msage@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s definitely not happening now under any social democracy.

        Socialism is supposed to be a transformative period, leading to communism. I have no idea why people write the !=.

        • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Because exclusively that’s the communist viewpoint. There are different socialist ideologies than communism. It’s a rectangle vs square situation.

            • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              “Socialism will transition to communism” is just a communism thing. Social democracy is different. It doesn’t involve communism. Because communism is cringe.

              • msage@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                Communism isn’t cringe, wtf are you talking about. And yes, if we want to discuss communism, we need to take into account that it was suggested to start with socialism beforehand.

                Social democracy has jack all to do with socialism, if we want to keep being pedantic. And social democracy does not fare all that well in poorer countries, even after massive EU funds. Which is the real cringe.