Trump's RNC chair includes Ukraine in list of US adversaries - eviltoast

Michael Whatley, Donald Trump’s hand-picked Republican National Committee (RNC) chair, lumped in Ukraine with China and Iran when listing the United States’ “aggressive” adversaries on Fox News’ Sunday Morning Futures.

“Joe Biden’s feckless leadership has shown China, has shown Ukraine, has shown Iran, that they can feel free to be much more aggressive on the world front to the point where even they will try and meddle with our elections here,” Whatley told host Maria Bartiromo on Sunday.

  • ExtraPartsLeft@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    7 months ago

    It makes me think Putin doesn’t actually have anything on Trump and the other Russia loving Republicans. They just really like him and are envious of his authoritarian regime.

    • Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m pretty sure he did. But it was all about campaign funding through the NRA. That little bit of news did slip out a while back. None of the GOP got in trouble. That’s why they don’t care now.

    • logicbomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Why not both? They could have something on those politicians and also be envied by them.

      Unless everything we know about Russian intelligence is wrong, Putin almost certainly has kompromat on many politicians. There was an article recently from a politician about how after he was elected, he started being approached by young beautiful women, and he realized after talking to other politicians just how trivial an effort it would be to get compromising material on most of them.

      According to George Clooney, he always saw Trump in NY bars trying to sleep with random women in the early 2000s. Trump was already a world famous “businessman” at the time who was into politics. Exactly the sort of person Russia could target and who would be easily compromised.

      • Carrolade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s fine to consider, but it’s also just an unnecessary step. Aligning with each other ideologically is enough to explain the cooperation we see.

        • ExtraPartsLeft@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s what I’m thinking too. Because to say that Putin has something on Trump at this point, is in some ways taking agency away from Trump. But I think Trump and the other Putin lovers are terrible enough people on their own. He doesn’t need to have any dirt on them, they just want to work with him because they think he’s doing well for himself, and they want that kind of power too. It feels like a much simpler explanation.