Court Bans Use of 'AI-Enhanced' Video Evidence Because That's Not How AI Works - eviltoast
This AI hype cycle has dramatically distorted society's views of what's possible with image upscalers.

A judge in Washington state has blocked video evidence that’s been “AI-enhanced” from being submitted in a triple murder trial. And that’s a good thing, given the fact that too many people seem to think applying an AI filter can give them access to secret visual data.

  • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.worldEnglish
    242·
    9 months ago

    Why not make it a fully AI court and save time if they were going to go that way. It would save so much time and money.

    Of course it wouldn’t be very just, but then regular courts aren’t either.

    • Sl00k@programming.devEnglish
      121·
      9 months ago

      In the same vein Bloomberg just did a great study on ChatGPT 3.5 ranking resumes and it had an extremely noticeable bias of ranking black names lower than the average and Asian/white names far higher despite similar qualifications.

      Archive source: https://archive.is/MrZIm

    • BreakDecks@lemmy.mlEnglish
      2·
      9 months ago

      Me, testifying to the AI judge: “Your honor I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am”

      AI Judge: “You are you are you are you are you are you…”

      Me: Escapes from courthouse while the LLM is stuck in a loop

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.worldEnglish
      42·
      9 months ago

      Honestly, an open-source auditable AI Judge/Justice would be preferable to Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch and Barrett any day.