The WHO declared aspartame "possibly" causes cancer. Here’s what that means. | Vox - eviltoast
  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Realistically what it means is that millions of people will react with “meh, still gonna use it.” I mean, have you met humans? We knew lead was toxic since at least the Roman era, but that didn’t stop us from using it in everything - including food and drink.

    • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The difference is that you can completely avoid lead poisoning if you eliminate exposure to lead, but you can’t completely avoid cancer even if you eliminate exposure to carcinogens.

      And eliminating exposure to aspartame would have only a minimal effect, at best, on your overall risk of cancer.

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      And they’ll do that while standing in bright sunlight without sunscreen, drinking beer, eating red meat, processed food, candy with real sugar and driving in fossil fuel cars which are in the same or higher category of cancer risks.

      • kusivittula@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        candy tastes good, beer gives me a warm fuzzy feeling, and i ain’t paying 10x more money for a car just so i get to spend 10 hours a week at some charging station so my tablet with wheels can go whirrrr.