Bernie Sanders unveils 32-hour workweek bill with no loss in pay for workers - eviltoast
  • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Actually, you’d need to charge 25% more if you only had 80% of the work to match your current profits (considering only the time and materials for that product and ignoring all other business expenses / taxes / etc.), since 1/0.8 = 1.25. If the worker makes 1 widget a day, you need 25% extra per day to make up the lost widget and still make 5 widgets worth of profit.

    • yarr@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Thanks for the correction. I believe my overall point still remains valid.

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Even moreso than before! I’ll be watching this thread, I’m curious how people are modelling the economic outcomes here.

    • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      ignoring all other business expenses / taxes / etc.

      …what business sector are we modeling where these are as negligible as you’re treating them to make this point???

      If you’re just here to correct the math then fine but at least be honest about the reality of what you’re calculating

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yes, I was just correcting the math. There are a lot of factors here and I don’t know what the actual cost-benefit analysis would be.