Group of up to 50 people shoplift about $100K worth of luxury items from L.A. mall; used bear spray against guards - eviltoast

Between 30 to 50 people swarmed the Nordstrom at the Westfield Topanga Mall in Woodland Hills, making off with thousands of dollars worth of luxury handbags and high-end clothing, an LAPD spokesman told NBC News.

  • MostlyBirds@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Stealing from wealthy corporations is an extremely valid and morally acceptable form of protest. Hell, it’s a morally good thing to do even if it’s not meant as a protest.

    I’m not going to defend assaulting the guards, though, except in the case of self-defense. Store security guards have no business using force against shoplifters, and most company policies align with that fact.

      • MostlyBirds@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Feel free to explain why it’s not objectively a good act to steal from the entities that themselves commit the overwhelming majority of theft, intentionally, systematically, and forcefully hold the majority of the worlds working population either in actual slavery, poverty, or at least unjustifiable and extreme financial insecurity that technically isn’t poverty because government definitions of poverty are patently absurd, and and who are actively and knowingly driving us towards towards the collapse of the environment and the greater part of biological life itself.

        I’ll give you a hint: you’re actually just wrong by any standard that values human life in any way.

    • norbert@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah have you ever been in a Nordstrom? Fuck that place, snatch all the handbags you can and sell them on eBay I don’t really care.

      You shouldn’t bear spray security and maybe they should be charged for it but at least he wasn’t shot or something.

      • keeb420@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        i feel bad for the employees who had to deal with it and clean up after and the guards that got assaulted. i dont feel bad for the above store level managers and execs who have to deal with this shit.

    • Deftdrummer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      So all those people who work for a living and contribute to society, who save up that money to buy those handbags are just schmucks? Give me a break.

      • dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago
        1. People that work for a living do not shop at Nordstrom’s

        2. The items were stolen from Nordstrom’s, not individuals

        • Deftdrummer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          What a tacitly disingenuous statement. What the fuck are you sniffing “people who work don’t shop there.”

          Your edgy 14 your old comment is ridiculous. What a jibe on the rich you just did!

          The items were stolen period. Fact. A crime. Never mind your rage against capitalism. Commit a crime and get put in jail.

          Commit a bodily crime over property, get put in the ground.

      • MostlyBirds@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You know someone is a shit person when they equate income with value as a human being.

        Even if that were a valid take, almost every working poor person contributes more to society than nearly any rich person does, and would therefore still have more human worth.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      There was also needless destruction. I can see breaking a glass case to grab some watches, but it appears that there was also destruction for the sake of destruction (at least in the video I watched).

          • Braggston08@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Some people dont seem to grasp how all of this works. They seem to think the insurance fairy will pay for the damages and not the businesses (and finally the customers).

          • Zorque@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You know, because obviously I’m a complete moron who has never had an intelligent thought in their life, in your estimation, I’d never thought about that…

            Of course premiums will go up. Insurance agencies are predatory scumbags, too. But I still have a hard time feeling sorry for luxury brands having to pay slightly higher premiums than they were before. Shockingly, its still just things.

            I know some people put the value of things over all else, but I find that to be a shortsighted and selfish way of thinking.

      • MostlyBirds@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Who actually gives a fuck about corporate property being destroyed? These companies commit more theft from their workers than all other theft combined. They objectively deserve this.