There is something wrong at the New York Times | From presidential polls to refusing to report on Trump’s stumbles, things aren’t adding up at the Gray Lady - eviltoast
  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Buddy, the soldiers went the second they were ordered to by the Civilians. Believe me, you do not want the military deciding to “protect” the capital all on it’s own. That’s the express route to dictatorship.

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Buddy, the outging president of the united states, who had already refused to follow the law and uphold democracy, was openly supporting “good people” who were trying to lynch Congress. And the Vice President, who also had the authority to call them in, was cowering in fear because he had every reason to believe that Secret Service agents would murder him.

      Rolling up and stopping the armed lunatics attacking the US Capitol Building is very much something the military can and should do.

      This is the equivalent of saying “Well. Russia/China/whoever attacked us. But they blocked the cell phone jammers and might have murdered the POTUS and VPOTUS. So… I guess we just wait until someone tells us we can fight them off?”

      But actively refusing to stop the outgoing POTUS from taking over the country with an armed mob because… the outgoing POTUS didn’t ask them to stop him? Hmmm. Why does THAT sound more like a route to a dictatorship?

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        There’s more than one person who can authorize that. In fact, Trump never authorized it. It was a DOD political appointee.