After 2-year-old girl shoots self, man becomes first person charged under Michigan's gun storage law - eviltoast

A Michigan man whose 2-year-old daughter shot herself in the head with his revolver last week pleaded not guilty after becoming the first person charged under the state’s new law requiring safe storage of guns.

Michael Tolbert, 44, of Flint, was arraigned Monday on nine felony charges including single counts of first-degree child abuse and violation of Michigan’s gun storage law, said John Potbury, Genesee County’s deputy chief assistant prosecuting attorney.

Tolbert’s daughter remained hospitalized Wednesday in critical condition from the Feb. 14 shooting, Potbury said. The youngster shot herself the day after Michigan’s new safe storage gun law took effect.

  • adhdplantdev@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I mean you can make the same argument about items like a bow and arrow, crossbows, and swords. There are valid reasons to have weapons in the house however they should be locked up so that they aren’t accessible normally.

      • adhdplantdev@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Target practice. Inherited heirlooms. Defense while camping. People find them cool. People keep guns for the same reason people keep swords. I understand that it is a tool designed for killing but at the end of the day it is still a tool. Don’t get me wrong I’m still all for gun control but I do understand why people would want to keep a gun in their home. You don’t have to agree with it but you shouldn’t punish people who responsibly own firearms.

        • boogetyboo@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          That’s the problem. I don’t think it’s possible to be responsible and own a firearm.

          I wouldn’t keep a tiger in my house. I don’t care if dad bequeathed it to me, or I totally have a lock on the door, or it’s ok, I’ve done a tiger training course. Why invite the risk? Because I really fucking like tigers? Fuck everyone else, I like tigers.

          • adhdplantdev@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            Okay that’s interesting thought. See the difference in your example is that a tiger is a sentient being but you have no control over. If I got bequeathed a tiger I probably surrender that too. A gun is a tool which is easily contained. What’s the difference between keeping a firearm and a sword or a bow and arrow when there are also tools initially designed to kill/maime?

            • boogetyboo@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              The control in both these examples comes from the human. Who should be smart enough not to keep weapons or tigers in a house. That decision is available to everyone. Unless your intention is to maim or kill. Then it makes sense.

              • adhdplantdev@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                9 months ago

                I see your mind is made up on this topic. You also haven’t addressed anything I have said. Good talk.

              • SupraMario@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                This is just flat out dumb, none of my firearms have ever been used for violence. They’re in a safe, and not loaded, and all my ammo is in another part of the house. Just because you can’t fathom how it’s possible to be safe with something that’s dangerous, doesn’t mean they’re automatically dangerous by themselves. Do you lock up your kitchen knives? Or make sure your matches are separate from the box they come in?

                  • SupraMario@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    9 months ago

                    Whole bunch of reasons.

                    I own a farm for one, I hunt, I carry daily, it’s a right that should be exercised, I shoot competitively because it’s fun, I collect them as well, and I love mechanical things.

                    And way more of us on the left are armed than you think, and more of us daily are becoming armed. I personally have gotten 4 of my left leaning friends to become firearm owners.

              • EtherWhack@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                So, no disinfectants (chemicals intended to kill, just really small things) either?

                How about pets? A cat’s teeth and claws were designed to kill, as are a dog’s fangs …err canines

              • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Do you mean geographically or are you asking for examples?

                Either way it really has nothing to do with the question of why someone would keep a gun in their home. There are people in the suburbs who hunt and there are suburbs that you can’t rely on police for protection. I grew up in one where home invasions and robberies were common.