Biden blames ‘congressional inaction’ for Ukrainian withdrawal of key town in call with Zelensky - eviltoast

President Joe Biden, in a call Saturday with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, directly tied Ukraine’s withdrawal from the key town of Avdiivka to Congress’ inability to pass further aid for the country’s effort to fend off Russia’s invasion.

“This morning, Ukraine’s military was forced to withdraw from Avdiivka after Ukrainian soldiers had to ration ammunition due to dwindling supplies as a result of congressional inaction, resulting in Russia’s first notable gains in months. President Biden emphasized the need for Congress to urgently pass the national security supplemental funding bill to resupply Ukrainian forces,” according to a White House readout of the call.

The call bookended a week defined by US attempts to reassert leadership on the world stage. It also highlighted renewed urgency to pass additional funds for Ukraine amid the withdrawal from Avdiivka, a key town that in recent months became one of the most fiercely contested battles on the eastern front, and the news of Kremlin critic Alexey Navalny’s death.

    • Jaytreeman@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      9 months ago

      No.
      The US pressured Putin to invade. Look up NATO expansion. Also what members of the US government had to say about the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.
      There’s no good guys here.

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        The US pressured Putin to invade. Look up NATO expansion.

        Let’s recap for the people who still fall for this BS. A Russian diplomat claims that during some negotiations back in the 1980s, he was given a verbal promise that NATO would never move east. Everyone he claims was part of this negotiation claims it never happened, no evidence that it ever happened has ever come out, and, more importantly, it was never codified in any treaty. Although Russia has regularly used it to justify their aggression since then.

        At one point, Ukraine started moving towards joining NATO, which pissed Putin off because he believes Ukraine to be part of Russia still. Ukraine elected a leader who claimed that he would remain neutral, but then decided to shift and get more cozy with Russia. They also decided to, because it was angering Russia and they didn’t want to end up in a war with them, shelve the idea of joining NATO. However, most Ukrainians wanted closer ties with Europe, so there was a revolution who ousted him. In response to this, Russia, who was unhappy with this, invaded and annexed part of Ukraine. All the good it did them not joining NATO!

        Falling for the dumb “appeasement” strategy again, they let Russia keep the stolen land. Then Russia, started funding (violating an actual written treaty) separatists in the east of the country, helping it get ripped apart by a civil war. So then Ukraine started talking about joining NATO again because, he, Putin just proved that not joining NATO wasn’t going to stop his aggression in the country. And then Putin claimed “hey! Remember that treaty we made up about not expanding NATO? Well, you’re violating it so we have no choice but to invade Ukraine.” And a bunch of rubes fell for this line and think it’s actually US and NATO that started this war, and not an imperialistic and aggressive Putin who started the war by invading a neighbor and illegally grabbing their land.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Not to mention the treaty after the fall of the Soviet Union where Ukraine would give up it’s nukes if Russia and the US would give assurances (though not guarantees) that each would help Ukraine if the other tried to invade.

          So really US support of Ukraine is following the spirit of that treaty.

          In other words, Putin is a rat faced liar.

          • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 months ago

            What was the purpose of NATO?

            NATO is a defensive alliance. Kinda seemed unnecessary with the fall of the Soviet Union, but with Russia starting land wars in Europe, has become extremely relevant again. Basically just prevents other countries from invading NATO countries. Putin doesn’t like it because he wants to invade countries. Countries like joining NATO because they don’t like being invaded.

            Is it still expanding?

            Yes. Finland has joined and Sweden is soon to join. After Putin’s invasion of Ukraine they didn’t want to also be invaded. They never joined during the Cold War, they weren’t as worried about the Soviet Union doing something as they are about Putin trying to attack them. So Putin has actually created the latest “expansion” of NATO, and now has a significantly longer border with NATO because of Finland joining. If NATO was the concern, this is a strategic defeat for Russia no matter the outcome of the war in Ukraine.

            Why are people so against the possibility that the US government could be doing that again, but in Ukraine now?

            Because it’s not at all the same situation. Ukraine is a democracy. Afghanistan had a Soviet puppet government the the Soviets were using their military to prop up.

            Besides, this kind of “trap” depends on Russia wanting to invade another country. It can be easily avoided by simply not invading another country.

            A lot of this logic relies on Russia having the right to invade Ukraine. It does not. Ukrainians have the right to join or not join NATO. It’s their decision, not anyone else’s. If Ukrainians want to join NATO, it does not give Russia the right to invade to prevent it from happening.

          • EatATaco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            I’m not against the possibility. Where did you get that idea? If you had some convincing evidence that this was the case, I would be interested in seeing it.

      • FidiFadi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        We seriously cannot expect the USA/EU to bail out Russian Federation every time for their poor foreign policy decisions. No international order can be sustained that way.

      • rdri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        The US pressured Putin to invade

        By what means exactly? Are you going to also claim Poland pressured Hitler to invade? Because that’s what Putin claims.

        Look up NATO expansion.

        Did you look it up yourself? Latest inclusions were after the invasion.