Biden blames ‘congressional inaction’ for Ukrainian withdrawal of key town in call with Zelensky - eviltoast

President Joe Biden, in a call Saturday with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, directly tied Ukraine’s withdrawal from the key town of Avdiivka to Congress’ inability to pass further aid for the country’s effort to fend off Russia’s invasion.

“This morning, Ukraine’s military was forced to withdraw from Avdiivka after Ukrainian soldiers had to ration ammunition due to dwindling supplies as a result of congressional inaction, resulting in Russia’s first notable gains in months. President Biden emphasized the need for Congress to urgently pass the national security supplemental funding bill to resupply Ukrainian forces,” according to a White House readout of the call.

The call bookended a week defined by US attempts to reassert leadership on the world stage. It also highlighted renewed urgency to pass additional funds for Ukraine amid the withdrawal from Avdiivka, a key town that in recent months became one of the most fiercely contested battles on the eastern front, and the news of Kremlin critic Alexey Navalny’s death.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      What was the purpose of NATO?

      NATO is a defensive alliance. Kinda seemed unnecessary with the fall of the Soviet Union, but with Russia starting land wars in Europe, has become extremely relevant again. Basically just prevents other countries from invading NATO countries. Putin doesn’t like it because he wants to invade countries. Countries like joining NATO because they don’t like being invaded.

      Is it still expanding?

      Yes. Finland has joined and Sweden is soon to join. After Putin’s invasion of Ukraine they didn’t want to also be invaded. They never joined during the Cold War, they weren’t as worried about the Soviet Union doing something as they are about Putin trying to attack them. So Putin has actually created the latest “expansion” of NATO, and now has a significantly longer border with NATO because of Finland joining. If NATO was the concern, this is a strategic defeat for Russia no matter the outcome of the war in Ukraine.

      Why are people so against the possibility that the US government could be doing that again, but in Ukraine now?

      Because it’s not at all the same situation. Ukraine is a democracy. Afghanistan had a Soviet puppet government the the Soviets were using their military to prop up.

      Besides, this kind of “trap” depends on Russia wanting to invade another country. It can be easily avoided by simply not invading another country.

      A lot of this logic relies on Russia having the right to invade Ukraine. It does not. Ukrainians have the right to join or not join NATO. It’s their decision, not anyone else’s. If Ukrainians want to join NATO, it does not give Russia the right to invade to prevent it from happening.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m not against the possibility. Where did you get that idea? If you had some convincing evidence that this was the case, I would be interested in seeing it.