“What Trump said was so damaging to him”: Experts say NY AG “struck gold” with Trump court rant - eviltoast

Former President Donald Trump’s Thursday courtroom tirade could backfire, legal experts warn.

Trump attorney Chris Kise asked Judge Arthur Engoron, who is overseeing Trump’s New York fraud trial, to allow Trump to speak on his own behalf during closing arguments. Engoron asked Trump if he would agree to stick to the facts and relevant law but the former president launched into a lengthy diatribe, accusing the judge and New York Attorney General Letitia James of waging a “political witch hunt” and demanding “damages” because the real “fraud is on me.”

During one portion of his rant, Trump referred to a key allegation in James’ lawsuit alleging that the former president’s Trump Tower penthouse was valued at three times larger than it actually is.

“They made a mistake. It was an honest mistake,” Trump said.

James’ team allowed Trump to speak until the judge ultimately shut him down and pleaded for Kise to “control your client.”

“There may be a reason that James’ staff didn’t interrupt,” wrote NBC News legal analyst Lisa Rubin. “The AG’s office may have struck gold because some of what Trump said was so damaging to him, especially his explanation of the triplex square footage ‘error.’

  • xantoxis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    10 months ago

    I don’t see that mattering since they were always going to appeal. Trump has never quietly accepted a consequence in his life, why would he start now.

    On the other hand, you may be right: These are some mighty incompetent defense lawyers, and they may have thought this would help.

    • Facebones@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Basically any case right now is a SCOTUS case, and that’s a stacked deck.

      So that’s fun.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        If Trump is actually convicted, I wouldn’t be surprised if the oligarchy that owns the SCOTUS decides to cut him loose completely. The SCOTUS can just decline to hear any appeals and leave him out with the laundry.

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            we’re huffing the good copium.

            I remember pointing out, that Trump was a millstone around the GOP, and they lost their chance to be rid of him with the second impeachment. If they had convicted him… he’d go away and they’d now be running somebody else against Biden. and probably win.

        • TheWoozy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          The problem with the SCOTUS avoiding responsibility on the issue is that it will up to each state to decide whether he should be on the ballet. Only blue states will abide by the constitution and keep him off. It won’t make a difference to the outcome, but it will feed the magats accusations of a rigged election.