• friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    45 minutes ago

    I used to commute an hour to work every day, each way, and the worst part was cross-merging traffic, exactly like there are 4 of in this design.

  • Sharkticon@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    53 minutes ago

    This would gridlock so fast. Actually I think it would gridlock so incredibly hard that cars would end up abandoned after they ran out of gas from how long they were stuck.

  • Luccus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I assume the ‘engineer’ has never seen a road or drove a car, because even if we assume more infrastructure will solve induced demand, and even if everyone’s going at a nice 30mph, this intersection is gonna go at like 3 accidents/minute.

  • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Those 180° turns look way too tight for semi-trailer trucks. Even the vans are drifting there.

    And all those single lanes, merging, and tight turns are a recipe for congestion.

    A proper roundabout would work much better, waste less concrete, and probably take up less space.

  • xlf42@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Not even 10am yet and enough of car brain for the day 🤦‍♂️.

    And yes I get it, some countries consider roundabouts (the ones used almost everywhere in the world) some black magic.

  • Maki@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    This was obviously designed with the assumption that people know how to drive without getting in one another’s way.

  • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    This looks like hell…

    It’s only one lane of traffic either way and you’ve got to merge in and out of two separate traffic flows in a short distance just to go ‘straight’ through to the other side.

  • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    19 hours ago

    This is just a flattened highway interchange.

    Also, holy shit so many combination enter/exit lanes, so many potential points of high-velocity conflict!

    • tomi000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Exacrly my thought, those already exist and work wonderfully, why try to make them flat and 100 times more dangerous in the process?

    • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      19 hours ago

      This is a roundabout. It’s just three roundabouts that only connect two roads each.

  • fox2263@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    16 hours ago

    It’s wonderful yes but relies on people leaving space to allow zippering.

    Unfortunately everyone is a bastard and goes bumper to bumper.

  • NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Around my area we have combination highway on ramps and exits where the lane for getting on immediately becomes the next exit. They are incredibly stressful and dangerous given just a tiny bit of traffic, everybody is frantically trying to merge on and off a short strip and accidents happen all the time. This intersection turns the entire road into that design lmao, they’re off their ass if they really think this design is any good

    • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Yeah that was my first thought too. They have those where I live, they’re usually like a quarter mile long but all of the action usually goes down in the first 100 feet or so, mega conflict zone.

  • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 day ago

    This design is an abomination really, there’d be so many accidents around the merging, where the traffic streams effectively have to swap over.

    Because, you know, cars and car infrastructure don’t already take up massive amounts of space as is.

    The only defence of this is that it would take LESS space than some kind of cloverleaf system. I think this whole design is trying to be space efficient whilst attemptign to keep traffic flowing (which it wouldn’t do).

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Making it so most of the traffic is in a merging state is a really bad idea. So many accidents happen because of people changing lanes, and here a large part of the traffic needs to do that, plus has little space and time to do it in. I’d love to see this made in something like City Skylines, just to show how bad it gets (without the car accidents, though, unless newest versions also simulate that).

      • huppakee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        and here a large part of the traffic needs to [change lanes]

        Only if you make a right turn you dont have to merge, but then there is still a lane merging into yours. So a (very) large part of the traffic has to change lanes, but everybody is merging. If you want to drive straight, you have to merge twice. Total madness.