How to intentionally get terminated from a job without sacrificing unemployment benefits? - eviltoast

My friend is a customer service rep who is ready to retire. Her company is talking about layoffs with 13+ weeks of severance, but when she asked (anonymously) if they were accepting volunteers, they said no. In case she’s not one of the ones told to clean out her desk, what are the ways she could get terminated while preserving her ability to claim unemployment (which would equal the 13 weeks of severance)?

UPDATE: She took my advice and saw her doctor. He agreed that she’s experiencing a job-related stress injury, set her up with a Disability claim, and referred her for psychiatric counseling.

  • Shadow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    11 months ago

    Ask for a raise. Tell them there’s no retirement plans because of inflation now, and she can see herself staying there another 10 years.

    They might not lay her off because they know she’ll retire soon anyways. Increase her cost of employment so it’s no longer cost effective to just wait it out.

        • lemmefixdat4u@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          I don’t see how asking for and not receiving a raise puts any more pressure on the company to surplus her. I agree with her that it would signal that she will quit if they don’t pay her more.

          It’s all moot at this point, because it looks like she’s going to get disability for job stress related illness. At least that’s what she’s told me her doctor said.

  • Froyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Easy. Email everyone in the company how much she makes.
    Start an email chain about wages.
    Open the handbook and start using/abusing the loopholes while pointing them out.

    And most importantly; do as little as possible while maintaining the job requirements as laid out in the listing.

      • Froyn@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I thought the idea was to “get severance”. Which would be "it’s cheaper to pay severance than permit them to continue disturbing the workplace. Sounds like you’re trying to advocate doing something illegal.

        • lemmefixdat4u@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Ideally she wants to be laid off. But if that doesn’t happen she wants to retire. I’ve been trying to convince her that retiring means no severance and no unemployment, so getting fired without cause is her next best option.

      • roofuskit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s the goal here though. If she wants to collect unemployment getting fired without cause is the plan.

        • Maeve@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I understand that, but the company isn’t going to outright say that’s why an employee is terminated. They’ll make up a reason, first.

      • cooopsspace@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s not in Australia either but it definitely happens. Seen it personally. Nobody will become a union representative if they’ve seen the last 3 not have their contract renewed for unknown reasons.

  • iHUNTcriminals@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Does lemmy have an unethical life pro tips community yet? You’d probably get better results if we did.

  • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    11 months ago

    Assuming this is in the US, be sure of your state’s unemployment laws. A lot of states say you are ineligible for unemployment if you are fired for cause, like attendance issues or failure to perform work duties.

    • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s important to note that, barring something egregious, single instances don’t meet the with cause definition.

      There has to be documented history that the issue was raised with you and addressed (verbal warnings, write ups etc.)

        • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          No, it doesn’t. A single occurrence of being late, or the first instance of being talked to about job performance does not meet the requirement of cause to deny you unemployment benefits.

          An employer has to demonstrate repeated occurrences with documentation to be able to justify denying unemployment. Without that they can contest your claim but as soon as you appeal it they will be overruled unless they can show a repeated pattern with corrective action documentation.

          • Usul_00_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            This varies by location. I’ve been through it on both sides in a few states, and when working with an employment lawyer one of the most crucial things he said was to make sure the filing was in the beneficial state.

      • chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Also worth noting that most companies prefer to treat any given firing as “without cause” because stating a reason is usually a net-loss in terms of legal exposure.

        Exceptions to the rule include, but are not limited to:

        • States which make it expensive/slow to fire without cause (because money)
        • Union jobs (because union)
        • Retaliative firings (because worker’s rights)
        • Prejudiced firings (because civil rights)

        How does one tell if they’re on the road to a with-cause termination? Simple: documentation. If you’re suddenly being put under a microscope it might indicate that a premeditated f-bomb is hiding around the corner.

        • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Exactly! Documentation is the best indicator, usually escalating from verbal, to written and then to final. A PIP, performance improvement plan, is another good indicator you’re on the block.

  • bighatchester@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    11 months ago

    For a call center you just have to not meet stats enough months in a row and they will fire you . I once had a job selling internet, tv and phone bundles . I consistently had top sales but got let go because I never always offered every single option I could to try and nickel and dime the customer. With extra fees for things they didn’t need .

    • lemmefixdat4u@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      She’s already been trying this. Takes her time looking up solutions, and then defends her long call times by saying she’s being thorough. The layoffs should be any time now, so we’ll see if that worked soon enough.

  • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Her company is talking about layoffs with 13+ weeks of severance

    How about talking about this topic everyday, to everybody, all day long?

    • Duranie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      Calm down Satan.

      I worked at a massage school and was running the student clinic early on a Saturday morning. About 8:30am a student microwaved some fish for breakfast. We got to smell that shit most of the day.

  • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    automate her job. build a script that can do the job, and train her boss to use it. now she’s redundant.

  • lemmefixdat4u@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Thank you all for the suggestions! One that I mentioned to her is to ask her doctor if her recent health issues could be related to the fact she gets stressed dealing with corporate customers, who can be very demanding. It’s an increasing proportion of her job that is not part of her original job description (actually the reason she wants to quit). Let it slip in the employee chat system that she’s seeing a doctor about workplace stress induced illness. Management will see it as a prelude to a workplace disability claim and want her out.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Get a doctor’s appoint on a Saturday, get approved for PTO that day, and then refuse to come in when they call you asking you to come to work while on your way to your doctor appointment.

    Happened to me.

  • Hello_there@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Apparently all you have to do is get photographed flipping off the presidential motorcade, and then tell HR about it.