Reposting because it was removed from another comm earlier for the political content.

  • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    He said to stop using money

    “Render unto Caesar” seems to be the opposite. He said to stop owning shit.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      He said to give up the coin they have and no longer use money between them. To share freely, so that Cesar couldn’t extract tax income from them in any way

      When the tax man shows up, you give them whatever they want and leave them frustrated. You return the coins you have to Cesar, and without stockpiles of goods the tax man would have to go house to house collecting random goods. You have no money to take, no grainary to take a portion of

      An empire can’t run off taking miscellaneous things from each pantry

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Yeah the concept of coins was still a very political topic at the time. They were a relatively recent invention that completely changed how society interacted

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          … What? No they weren’t

          Anyways, it’s not about coins, it’s about taxes. Taxes can be collected in the form of currency or in bulk goods

          If you don’t have any coins or bulk storage, your community is not economically productive for whoever owns the territory. There’s nothing to take

          But infrastructure must me maintained anyways, an empire lives and dies on it’s roads