Sen. Mitt Romney Says He Would Vote For 'Virtually' Anybody Other Than Trump or Ramaswamy - eviltoast
    • onestop@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      serious question, without naming any politicians, do you think any of the candidates is going to do a good job, from any party, I don’t want to put you in the spot so just yes or no is fine.

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It takes two to come to an agreement but only one to start a fight. If one party is dedicated to stopping all progress, the other can only govern if it has a super majority.

        • onestop@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          good as in being able to balance the budget while keeping inflation low and helping people, all people, earn a living wage, fight for education so we can start exporting engineers and doctors who get money abroad and spend it in the US, instead of importing them, make healthcare care and homes affordable. Last president who balanced the budget was Clinton, I believe, and home costs have been going through the roof after the pandemic. Engineers and doctors are coming from Asia. The military is the last good thing but the cost is very high.

          But I think I agree with you, expectations is what drives the votes.

          • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Okay, everything is incremental (and no one politician can do everything by themselves), but Obama’s platform was Healthcare reform, and he got that done, just not as much as we wanted. But it still made Healthcare more affordable for the low and low/middle classes, and it established regulations on what must be covered and made businesses with full-time workers responsible to give health insurance. Is it everything we could hope for? No. Was it better than what was before it? Yes. He still had a ton of things against him (renewing PATRIOT Act, drone-striking a bunch of children, not supporting LGBTQ+ people until it was a foregone conclusion, etc), but he helped with Healthcare.

            Biden and Democrats have tried to institute student loan forgiveness (and been fought against at every corner). They are constantly fighting against the dismantling of the education system by the Republicans, and I’d say holding the line is an achievement in itself (though they kind of suck at holding lines). And inflation has slowed dramatically over the past several months (under Biden), largely due to efforts put in place in the past that are only now bearing fruit.

            So yes, some politicians have been doing some good, and the perfect is the enemy of the good. If your expectations for what would be considered a “good” politician is to single-handedly fix all the problems that you personally take issue with, no politician will ever be “good.”

            • onestop@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              good points, but the changes at their best help only the poor, or the people that make up to 4 times the poverty level which is only about 35k or 50k tops. then you have a section of society from50k to 100k who is mostly screwed and have to pony up everything for everything. They try to fix it, but fixing it for some is not fixing it, they must fix it for all if it’s going to make an impact.

              • spaceghoti@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                So you’re determined to make perfect the enemy of good. Maybe one day you’ll learn the world just doesn’t work that way, especially not when the party of con artists and grifters is willing to sabotage any initiative that might accomplish what you demand so you buy into the “both sides” bullshit.

                • onestop@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  why are you attacking me? make your arguments and let’s have a conversation. this seems like a cope out answer.

                  • spaceghoti@lemmy.one
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Because you’re promoting the “both sides” bullshit, and I’m out of patience with it. If you want to see more progress, get out the vote. Stop repeating Republican talking points.

          • mateomaui@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Then no.

            edit: I would consider that an exemplary, holy-shit-how-did-you-manage-this-without-outlawing-Republicanism job.

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Doing a good job? Debateable. Not being evil? Some of them, but very few on the Republican side.