i_have_no_enemies@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 年前The Theory That Men Evolved to Hunt and Women Evolved to Gather Is Wrongwww.scientificamerican.comexternal-linkmessage-square149fedilinkarrow-up1479arrow-down192cross-posted to: science@lemmy.worldscience@beehaw.orgarchaeology@mander.xyzdeco_genere@info.prou.be
arrow-up1387arrow-down1external-linkThe Theory That Men Evolved to Hunt and Women Evolved to Gather Is Wrongwww.scientificamerican.comi_have_no_enemies@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 年前message-square149fedilinkcross-posted to: science@lemmy.worldscience@beehaw.orgarchaeology@mander.xyzdeco_genere@info.prou.be
minus-squareGympie_Gympie_pie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down8·1 年前How can you comment and criticise an article that you haven’t read thoroughly?
minus-squareEatATaco@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·edit-21 年前I admitted to the amount of effort I put in, then made an actual argument against what they said. Maybe I’m wrong, maybe not. What did you do? Nothing but an empty criticism. Bet ya felt real smart doing so too.
How can you comment and criticise an article that you haven’t read thoroughly?
I admitted to the amount of effort I put in, then made an actual argument against what they said. Maybe I’m wrong, maybe not.
What did you do? Nothing but an empty criticism. Bet ya felt real smart doing so too.