• zd9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    152
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    “grave damage to national security” is the definition of the Top Secret classification level, and it’s probably in several SCI compartments too.

    This bitch is a Russian asset who has been exfiltrating national secrets to Putin for years (is the commonly accepted allegation).

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      2 months ago

      Which also means there is no reason Congress cannot be briefed. Congresspersons are routinely read into SCI and SAP compartments for basic oversight duty. They have their own SCIF and everything. If the regime is withholding access to oversight, it’s only because Republicans on these committees are refusing to force the issue.

      • zd9@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s obvious to anyone who reads past the most surface reading of anything. This regime lies just like you and I breathe. Almost everything they say is a lie.

        One day, hopefully soon, he will be gone, and this whole thing will hopefully implode, but the damage is done. It’s funny, because this whole regime has done “grave damage to national security” in many different senses.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Congress probably cannot be told because a lot of Republicans are in that document

  • JohnnyFlapHoleSeed@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    2 months ago

    Tulsi has left a paper trail showing how Trump, his entire admin, as well as the scrotus are compromised by Russia/Israel. They’re trying to figure out how to bury that along with everything else they’re trying to hide.

  • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    2 months ago

    Being locked in a safe only means Secret or above. However, the use of the phrase “grave damage to national security” indicates Top Secret. That’s the sort of thing that’s usually only accessed in a SCIF.

      • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        Must have been typing at the same time. I looked to see if anyone said the same thing. I got distracted in the middle of writing my comment as well. But, yes that wording is very specific.

  • Gerudo@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 months ago

    Even with this, wasn’t she the one who tagged along with the stealing of the 700 boxes of Georgia election results? Only the best.

    • paequ2@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 months ago

      Everything from calling her a Russian asset to voting abuse.

      So… is she gonna be the next president of the United States?

      • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        A republican woman candidate at this point would be interesting. I imagine her having to occasionally pander to the tradwife stereotype, Katie Britt style, with a little bit of Mom’s Old Fashioned Robot Oil and maybe some Martha Stewart mixed in. We got a little preview with Sarah Palin. I wonder what the think tanks learned from that.

        • jollyrogue@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Possessing the Necronomicon Ex-Mortis and the knowledge of how to wield it?

          It’s hard to think of anything that would matter to anyone who could do something about it at this point.

          The US is such a failed state.

  • ExtremeDullard@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m all for shitting on any and all members of the Trump regime, but I’m not buying this one: if it’s so classified, how come we get to hear about it?

  • 7toed@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    It also implicates another federal agency

    Oooh boy who wants to take bets? Maybe how the FBI covered for her. Maybe she exfiltrated some information, NNSA or DOE would be funny but kinda boring. I’d imagine even just sharing capabilities could land this top secret to begin.

  • frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Get the whistleblower in front of an intelligence congressional committee and ask about it. The regime won’t tell you shit if you’re not GOP.

  • Sundray@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    “Grave damage to national security,” or, “Moderately embarrassing, but we will never co-operate because fuck Congress”?