“P.S. It’s Not Shameful to Resign”: Rep. Jamie Raskin Returns George Santos’s Error-Riddled Letter With Notes - eviltoast

Lead impeachment manager for Donald Trump’s second House trial, January 6 committee member, cancer survivor, and now—copy editor? Congressman Jamie Raskin added another line to his lengthy resume on Friday in a tart response to embattled New York Representative George Santos, who had penned a poorly written letter thanking the Maryland Democrat for voting against kicking him out of the House of Representatives.

Santos’s letter came two days after most Republicans and 31 Democrats voted against a resolution led by five of Santos’s fellow first-term New York Republicans who have been anxious to distance themselves from their disgraced colleague. The 179-213 tally fell far below the two-thirds majority needed to expel a House member.

“I am writing to express my gratitude to you for standing up to the principals of due process and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty,” Santos wrote. In copy edits handwritten on his copy of the letter and later reported by Politico, Raskin cheekily let Santos know that “principals” should have been “principles.”

“Dear Congressman Santos, I appreciate your note and only wish someone had proofread it first,” Raskin wrote. “Meantime, you should apologize to the people of New York for all of your lies and deceit. I know you must have thought you could get away with it all in the party of Trump, but the truth is resilient.” The Maryland representative ended the letter with a “P.S.”: “It’s not shameful to resign.”

  • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The idea is to not set a precedent that a member of the House can be removed before being found guilty of a crime. He’s also at least trying to stop the GOP from employing their usual tactics of “Do what the Democrats did to us, only dumber” and filing random retaliatory motions to expel outspoken Democrats like Tlaib.

    He wasn’t voting in favor of Santos. He was voting against opening Pandora’s box.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      He wasn’t voting in favor of Santos. He was voting against opening Pandora’s box.

      You say that as if Republicans wouldn’t just gleefully throw it open the first chance they got anyway.

      • djsoren19@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I know it’s easy to lump all of the Republicans together as a crazy bunch of morons, but there’s a handful of them that posess a functioning brain and are just evil. It seems like Raskin has a functioning brain and understands this action might have consequences for his party later down the line.

    • billwashere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And honestly keeping him around causes a certain amount of chaos that is damaging to the Republican brand. Not sure if that’s the intent buts it’s certainly a welcome side effect.