Emotional outburst on live TV from Gaza over death of reporter encapsulates collective grief - eviltoast

“No one is looking at us or the extent of this disaster or the crimes that we are experiencing in Gaza,” he said. Still holding his microphone, he slid off his flak jacket marked with the word PRESS and unstrapped his helmet.

“These protection jackets and helmets don’t protect us,” he said, flinging the equipment to the ground. “Nothing protects journalists. … We lose our lives for no reason.”

  • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    And I want you to see that the situation was relatively stable and peaceful on 6 Oct before Hamas started this war

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Whatever label you want to put on it, the conflict existed before October. It is a continuum of back and forth violence

          • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Whatever label you want to put on it, there was a ceasefire in place and had been one for years.

            • jet@hackertalks.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I don’t know what ceasefire you’re referring to, I couldn’t find any documentation for a ceasefire.

              In 2023 there are multiple instances of Hamas launching rockets at Israel, Israeli soldiers killing Hamas, and Hamas killing Israeli soldiers. You can check the Wikipedia of the conflict for the details.

              A ceasefire that allows for rocket attacks, and soldiers fighting, seems ineffective

              • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                The ceasefire meant that Gaza wasn’t subject to military action on the scale of a war, like it is today. A low, simmering conflict involves a few hundred deaths a year, a war is orders of magnitude more vicious. You know this. Why are you deliberately being obtuse?

                • jet@hackertalks.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  conflicts like this have multiple participants, who have multiple viewpoints, and you’re not doing justice to the conflict by saying there was peace before October.

                  I’m not being obtuse, I’m trying to use English correctly:

                  https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/cease-fire#English

                  cease-fire (plural cease-fires)

                  In warfare, an agreed end to hostilities for a specific purpose. (Typically only temporary).

                  By pointing out the continued history of violence, we have demonstrated that there was not a end of hostilities, that there was not an agreement between the belligerent parties, there was not a ceasefire.

                  I will agree with you, however before October, Gaza strip was being ignored. The world was more or less happy with the situation, but the gazans weren’t.