Sen. Dianne Feinstein, an 'icon for women in politics,' dies at 90, source confirms - eviltoast

Senator Dianne Feinstein’s career was filled with firsts, including first woman mayor of San Francisco and one of two of the first women elected to the U.S. Senate from California.

  • Heresy_generator@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Newsom has been clear that he’s appointing someone as a placeholder so as not to interfere in next year’s Senate race by giving one of the actual contenders (Schiff, Porter, or Lee) the advantage of incumbency. But I’m sure that Nancy Pelosi, being Nancy Pelosi, would prefer the Party put their finger on the scale for the candidate leadership wants (which is probably 77 year-old Barabra Lee)

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Schiff, Porter, or Lee

      Aren’t they all in the House right now? Appointing one of them is a mixed bag, because it also leaves their House seat vacant until a special election is held, and Democrats need every vote they can get there. House seats can’t be filled with temporary appointments like Senate seats can.

    • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Pelosi wants Adam Schiff. Newsom stated he wants a black woman (bc ofc he cares about identity politics) in the interim, likely Lee. Pelosi doesn’t want Lee since she’s more progressive than Schiff.

      The temporary choice will have a massive leg up as an incumbent in the next election.

      • a lil bee 🐝@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        He wants a black woman in the seat because despite making up 15% of the population, there are zero black women in the senate. Why wouldn’t they deserve representation in our senate?

        • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Race and gender should be irrelevant in politics. The only thing that should matter in the end are policies, since that is what affects the constituency.

          Race and gender now are used as distractions to make people think that someone is more progressive than they really are.

          You can still be corrupt if you are a black woman.

            • jscummy@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s a fair point to say race/gender aren’t the most important type of representation. There’s a whole lot of white men in Congress, and as a white man I don’t feel particularly “represented” by Tuberville or Gaetz

            • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Yes, and race and gender don’t play a factor in the policies that are voted for.

              You take money from big donors? You will represent those big donors regardless of race, gender, etc.

          • a lil bee 🐝@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            This viewpoint is simplistic to the point of losing all sense. As another commenter pointed out, representation is the entire point of a republic. Countries have split and wars have been fought over this exact point. Hell, the United States only exists at all because of it.

            Race and gender start to matter as soon as they become significant factors in our laws and that has been a constant from day one. I don’t care how much you think you know, you do not fully understand the perspective of someone with a radically different life than your own, because of what they have faced due to their race, gender, or any other distinguishing factor. They deserve representation so that their perspective is heard and factored into the laws that govern them.

            This is the basis of what a republic is. You can’t take race and gender out. You can only over represent your own and ignore others while patting yourself on the back like you solved it. It’s intellectual, moral, and legal cowardice.