The potential blunder in Trump's Manhattan trial - eviltoast
  • ATQ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do we feel better about one person deciding Trumps guilt or 12?

    • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      “With respect to Trump, an overwhelming majority of the grand jurors recommended that the district attorney seek indictments against him for a litany of offenses related to the call,” wrote Lawfare’s Anna Bower. “Elsewhere in the report, the jurors also recommend charges against Trump in connection to separate communications with Georgia officials and other efforts to overturn the 2020 election. For each of the charges recommended for Trump, one juror—though perhaps not the same juror—voted against the charges.” In all of Trump’s trials with a jury, a single hold-out could stop the former president from being ruled guilty and facing a sentence.

      It sounds like one person is already deciding Trump’s guilt (or non-guilt, as it were), so I’d rather it be a judge than some random juror.

      • Billiam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        It seems far more likely to me that one person refused to charge Trump, than to believe that multiple people thought he was guilty of every charge but one and differed on which that one charge was.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      The judge in this case is absolutely fed up with Trump’s bullshit. I think he might be in trouble. He might actually lose his NY properties.

    • TechyDad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      With a jury of 12 people, you could still have 1 person decide Trump’s guilt. Say the trial ends and the jury goes to deliberate. 11 people say he’s guilty. 1 guy says Not Guilty and refuses to budge no matter what. That one holdout could decide whether or not Trump is found guilty - even if it’s because the holdout is a hardcore MAGA fan that got onto the jury.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Those jury selection hearings would’ve been entertaining though. With the attorneys trying to quickly sort out who is a maggot and who isn’t and squabbling over it.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        It would result in a hung jury and a mistrial.

        Which would likely result in retrial, not letting trump off the hook. (It is possible the judge lets it drop? But unlikely.)

        • Billiam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Problem is that retrials vastly favor the defendant, because now they have the prosecutors arguments as well as the evidence and it becomes easier to tailor the defense.