‘Thirsty’ ChatGPT uses four times more water than previously thought - eviltoast

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/32023985

Writing a 100-word email using ChatGPT (GPT-4, latest model) consumes 1 x 500ml bottle of water It uses 140Wh of energy, enough for 7 full charges of an iPhone Pro Max

  • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Climate is a separate issue. You can supply green energy, nuclear, or burn fossil fuels. Say what you want, but as far as energy production goes, free market keeps delivering since decades.

    And it just happens, that regions suffering from the biggest fresh water deficit also happen to have good conditions for solar energy production.

    • Prunebutt@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Climate is a separate issue.

      To the energy requirements of our economy? I beg to fucking differ.

      And it just happens, that regions suffering from the biggest fresh water deficit also happen to have good conditions for solar energy production.

      Well, I guess the droughts are their own fault, then, or what? 🙄

      • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        To the energy requirements of our economy? I beg to fucking differ.

        Well, yes - because energy can be produced from renewable sources. It isn’t fault of general economy, that the energy sector produces lots of CO2.

        The solution isn’t to scale down economy, its to replace fossil fuels with nuclear and renewables

        Well, I guess the droughts are their own fault, then, or what?

        What???

        • Prunebutt@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          The solution isn’t to scale down economy, its to replace fossil fuels with nuclear and renewables

          There’s not enough resources in the world to keep our current economic output while also switching to renewables. I think you unerestimate the energy density of fossil fuels.

          Fossil fuels aren’t only used by power plants and cars. The whole steel industry relies on fossils. How are you gonna supply heavy industry and electric cars and datacenters and desalination plants while also phasing out fossil power plants.

          Not even talking about the problems with nuclear.

          • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            There’s not enough resources in the world to keep our current economic output while also switching to renewables.

            Well, you’re wrong. For example in France almost all electricity comes from mix of nuclear and renewable sources.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_sector_in_France

            Around 70% nuclear, 11% hydro and only like 7,5% from fossil (rest are solar, wind and biomass)

            Switching transportation to electric is much more difficult but it’s happening. 10 years ago, electric cars just weren’t a thing.