@xkyfal18 - eviltoast

The bourgeoisie doesn’t even lift. We must liberate the swoletariat.

  • 0 Posts
  • 53 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 22nd, 2024

help-circle

  • Thanks, comrade, you are correct. It wasn’t my intentions to say Socialism is free of contradictions, it’s just that the “half socialist half capitalist” thing never made sense to me.

    By “contradict each other” I meant they’re completely opposing forces. They either struggle to or cannot coexist within the same superstructure i.e how can you have the proletariat and the bourgeoisie as the ruling class?

    From my understanding, China is, right now, using the Capitalist system (and bringing along all its contradictions) to build productive forces in order to pave the way for Socialism, as Capitalism is the system whose contradictions will create the conditions for Socialism to flourish; it’s now in a very early stage of Socialism.

    Like I said before, I haven’t had much time to brush up on theory as I used to, but I will make sure to revise my knowledge on Materialism like you pointed out, comrade.




  • Well, that opinion is definitely wrong. China isn’t perfect (living in a world with less desirable material conditions does that), however, it’s the Socialist nation that has managed to develop itself the most, so there’s that. The reason why it survived the 80s and the 90s wave of color revolutions was because it learned from the mistakes of the USSR and the eastern bloc.

    Also, yeah there was a lot of incompetence in the communist parties of both the USSR and the Eastern bloc in general, but there were also many principled communists as well. There was also a lot of friction between its countries, for example, Albania siding with China and denouncing the USSR and the events that led to the Prague Spring in Czechoslovakia.



  • That’s not how it works. A system cannot be “half socialism half capitalism” as these two concepts quite literally contradict each other.

    Socialism is the process of transition from capitalism to communism. It’s defined by a society where the proletariat has become the ruling class, after having the former ruling class overthrown through revolution; a society where the state serves the interests of the workers and naturally withers away (as Lenin puts it) as the concept of class begins to disappear (as we get closer to communism). For more info on this, you can read state and revolution, by Lenin. As for dialectical and historical materialism, you can read Socialism: utopian and scientific, by Engels and Dialectical and Historical Materialism, by the man of steel himself.

    Capitalism is the system that came after feudalism and before Socialism. It’s defined by giving full power to the Bourgeoisie and, contrary to under Socialism, the state serves the interests of the Bourgeoisie. Here’s a (very) basic explanation of each one:

    1. Early capitalism (idk the marxist term for it): Small competition among national bourgeoisie.

    2. Monopoly Capitalism: As the nature of Capitalism naturally leads to monopolization, the means of production are at a large scale concentrated in the hands of a few.

    3. Imperialism, the highest stage of Capitalism: Capitalism needs infinite growth and expansion to survive, so it exports capital (workers, firms, factories) abroad in order to expand and increase profits.

    My definitions might be slightly incorrect, i haven’t had the time to read theory in a while due to life circumstances

    One could assume China is revisionist for adopting a market economy instead of a strictly planned economy, like the one in the USSR and former Socialist bloc, but this argument is fundamentally wrong, since it’s extremely idealistic to think of Socialism as a fixed set of rules that must be forced upon the material conditions of said society and not the other way around (and that’s why the “not real socialism” argument doesn’t even make any sense). The truth is that, while it’d have been more desirable for China to keep a planned economy, opening up to the West and its capital (under heavy supervision and control of the CPC) allowed China to flourish and become the very industrialized nation that it is today, and I think if Mao could see what his country became, he would be very proud.



  • Dumbass logic. You can neither push away Fascism nor vote it out, as Fascism is literally a product of the Capitalist system.

    Also, you’re assuming the current status quo is good and must be protected. This is wrong, it should (and has to) be overthrown and replaced by a dictatorship of the proletariat. Only this can stop Fascism by cutting the root of all evil.






  • CW: mild mention of personality disorder

    Pretty much in the same place. Was diagnosed with szpd when I was a kid and ever since I’ve struggled to make friends. However, what I can tell you is: find something you really enjoy doing and meet people who enjoy doing the same. For example, I love working out and programming and that allowed me to foster great friendships.

    It wasn’t easy and it won’t be tbh, many come and go, but keep trying! :)




  • And what do those protests aim to replace the “terrible dictatorship” with? Yeah, a pro American actual dictatorship.

    Oh, and one more thing: dictatorships aren’t made by individuals, they’re lead by classes, the “dictator” is merely the one who carries out the interests of said class. Therefore, Fascism is the most extreme form of capitalism, the naked dictatorship of the bourgeoisie, just like socialism is the dictatorship of the proletariat.